WAPDA Schedule of Tariff B-2
WAPDA Schedule of Tariff B-2 legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Revised Schedule of Tariff even otherwise not intended to be effective retrospectively, having been enforced long after filing of constitutional petition, held, would not be available to be exercised retrospectively and was quashed by High Court in exercise of constitutional jurisdiction.
Read with clause 14 of Standard Agreement '(Abridged Conditions)-Demand of fixed charges for Authority's reservation of power-Consumer giving seven days' notice to Authority for having disconnection of supply of energy as his mills required to be closed down on account of repairs to furnace
Question of billing of consumer for period of disconnection not arising.-Expression `all other charges following words `all charged in respect of energy consumed' as used in clause 14 of Standard Agreement includes fixed charges
Held, when requirement of notice complied with by consumer hr cannot be saddled with liability for fitted charges
"WAPDA Schedule of Tariff B-2", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13836
Precedents & Case Laws citing "WAPDA Schedule of Tariff B-2"
P L D 1976 Supreme Court 254
THE CHAIRMAN, ELECTRICITY WAPDA. LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus Ch. MUHAMMAD SHAFI, ADVOCATE‑Respondent
Court: S. 25‑Contract Act (I of 1872), S. 23‑Contract‑WAPDA empowered under S. 25 to change rates of power subject to directions in subsection (2) of S. 25‑Conditions in agreement of supply between consumer and WAPDA consistent with law and requirement of subsection (2) kept in view (to defeat large scale pilferage of energy by levying fixed charge on connected load basis) Change in rates, held, not unauthorised and provisions of S. 23, Contract Act, 1572, not attracted to case.‑Contract.1995 C L C 1310
MALIK ICE FACTORY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus WAPDA‑‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1971 Lahore 462
M. DAUD KHAN AND 20 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High Court2020 P T D (Trib
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SRB, KARACHI Versus Messrs MOHSIN MEHMOOD (MANZOOR AHMAD)
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate TribunalP L D 1994 Lahore 163
MUHAMMAD JAVAID and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY‑‑‑Respondent
Court:P L D 2000 Supreme Court 841
through Chief Executive and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN WAPDA through Chairman
Court: Per Sh. Riaz Ahmed, J., Sh. Ijaz Nisar and Munir A. Sheikh, JJ. agreeing‑‑Majority view‑‑1996 C L C 1090
TEXTILE MILLS, PATTOKI, DISTRICT KASUR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus WAPDA through Chairman WAPDA, WAPDA House,
Court: Lahore2006 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal PakistanP L D 2014 Balochistan 173
Messrs BOLAN STEEL INDUSTRIES (PVT) LTD. through Managing Director and others — Petitioners Versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA) through Chairman and others — Respondents
Court: High Court