Thal Development Scheme
Thal Development Scheme legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Appellate Court, however, non-suited plaintiff on the ground that sale agreement in question, was void being violative of para.30, Thal Development Scheme and S.19, Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912
High Court affirmed finding of Appellate Court
Validity
Leave to appeal was granted to consider, whether conclusion recorded by Appellate Court and maintained by High Court, in revision that agreement in question, was in fact sale and not agreement to sell and, therefore, was void on account of being violative of para.30, Thal Development Scheme and S.19, Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912, was in accordance with law.
"Thal Development Scheme", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13854
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Thal Development Scheme"
1997 S C M R 961
SULTAN AHMAD and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MEHR DIN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2004 M L D 1685
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (COLONIES) PUNJAB, LAHORE-Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1976 Lahore 258
CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE‑Applicant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, LAHORE ZONE, LAHORE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ S. 4(3) (iii)‑"Local authority"‑Definition‑General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 3(28).‑Words and phrases.1988 S C M R 76
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and another — Appellants Versus JIWAN and others — Respondents
Court: ---Ss. 21(2) & 36(6) as amended by Thal Development (Amendment) Act (XX of 1955) --Amendment of S.36 not retrospective in operation- Acquisition of land--No scheme was framed before promulgation of amending Act (XX of 1955) acquisitions made before promulgation of said Act were without any legal sanction--Validity to earlier sanctions was conferred by adding subsection (6) to S.36 by amending Act of 1955--Acquisition as also provisions of Act came into effect at the same time and purchasers from originally recorded owners subsequent to issuance of notification for acquisition under amended S.36(1) of Act could avail benefit of provisions which were introduced into statute by subsequent amendments and there was no question of giving retrospective effect to subsequent amendment in circumstances.1991 C L C 1417
GHULAM MUHAMMAD and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ADMINISTRATOR, T.DA. and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1976 S C M R 233
HASAN MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER-‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB AND OTHERS — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1978 Lahore 372
MUHAMMAD IQBAL AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus MEMBER. BOARD OF REVENUE (COLONIES), PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1982 C L C 1565
RAB NAWAZ KHAN AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus ADMINISTRATOR, THAL, BHAKKAR‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1986 Supreme Court 96
Hakim ABDUR RAHIM KHAN AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus WEST PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT THROUGH THE SECRETARY, RESETTLEMENT AND CLAIMS, LAHORE AND ANOTHFR‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1979 C L C 585
Ch. ALI MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus THE ADMINISTRATOR, THAL BHAKKAR, DISTRICT
Court: Lahore