Home Maxims & Terms Shamilat meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Shamilat

Shamilat legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2006 SCMR 688 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Shamlat land would vest in occupants of Deh (village)Municipal Committee would have no right to utilize such land except for the purpose for which same was reserved

If Municipal Committee wanted to utilize such land for any other purpose, then permission of occupants of Deh (village) would be mandatory

Municipal Committee, without such authorization could not convert amenity plot into commercial plot.

1995 SCMR 944 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Shamilat Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)Dispute relating to ownership of Shamilat Deh and its partition

Leave to appeal was granted to consider whether whole of the Shamilat Deh was owned by Hindu owners or by both Hindu and Muslim owners and whether partition thereof, had taken place or not.

1993 SCMR 1578 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
ShamilatLand in Shamlat DehPlaintiffs on basis of being Aala Malkan claiming ownership of land in questionPlaintiffs not proved to be the exclusive owners of land comprising Shamlat

In absence of evidence that defendants had broken the land (nautor) with the permission of plaintiffs, latter were not entitled to a decree for possession or even for ejectment for having not pleaded that they had accorded implied permission to defendants to occupy the land in question.

1993 SCMR 381 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Shamilat

Definition.

1961 PLD 131 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Wajib-ul-arz-Shamilat-Custom-Right of villagers of adjoining village to cut wood and grass for themselves-light in nature of custom-Not a licence.

1954 PLD 80 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Shamilat

Dried up water channel-One co-sharer cannot use site of channel to exclusion of others.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Shamilat", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13866

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Shamilat"

SCMR 1987
Civil Appeal No. 33‑P of 1975, decided on 10th June, 1987.

1987 S C M R 1667

FAZAL RAHIM and others‑‑Appellants Versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2004
2003-April-10

2004 C L C 675

ALLAH NOOR and others — Petitioners Versus RAHAM BADSHAH and others — Respondents

Court: Board of Revenue N.-W.F.P.
CLC 2012
2012-July-6

2012 C L C 1803

SHER AFGHAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and another — Respondents

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeal No-439 of 1980, decided on 3rd February, 1991.

1991 S C M R 1386

GHULAM HUSSAIN and others — Appellants Versus ALLAH BAKHSH and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeal No. 1.02 of 1981, decided on 3rd February, 1991.

1991 S C M R 1119

MUHAMMADA through Legal Heirs and others — Appellants Versus MAULA DAD and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1980
Regular Second Appeal No. 529 of 1965, decided on 14th May 1980.

P L D 1980 Lahore 606

MUHAMMADA ETC.-Appellants Versus MAULA DAD ETc.-Respondents

Court: S. 3-.Sale of share in well-Vendor, not in possession of shamilat right at time of sale, selling one-third share in well-Vendor and vendee subsequently acquiring rights in shamilat by fulfilling conditions under terms of wajib-ul-arz and Muafi-Such sale cannot be said to be sale of shamilat, and or any portion appurtenant theretoHeld S. 3 not applicable to such case--Hakaman etc. v. Gulsher etc. Law Notes 1966 Lab. 49 held not applicable.
YLR 2000
N/A

2000 Y L R 485

PATHANA and 10 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus NOORA and 32 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2021
Civil Revision No. 847-P of 2009, decided on 2nd March, 2020.

2021 Y L R 84

BAHADUR and 82 others — Petitioners Versus COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION and 13 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 1983
Regular Second Appeal No. 12 of 1971, heard on 25th September, 1982.

1983 C L C 51

CHIRAGH SHAH (REPRESEMED BY LEGAL HEIRS)‑Appellant Versus AKHTAR MUNIR AND 25 OTHERS‑Defendants‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 2001
Civil Appeal No. 171 of 2000, decided on 19th January, 2001.

2001 C L C 920

FOJDAR KHAN and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary,

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)