De facto, doctrine of
De facto, doctrine of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Common and pre-dominant feature of de facto doctrine is in relation to exercise of power by holder of the public office, when it is found to be not legally entitled to exercise or perform such power of public office
Such exercise of power is saved on principle of de facto doctrine on the sound principles of public policy and to maintain regularity in conduct of public business and to save the public from confusion and to protect the right which a person may have acquired as a result of exercise of power by holder of public office not entitled to perform or exercise such power
Necessary ingredients for de facto exercise of power by the holder of public office is that the office should exist in the first place
If there is no public office in existence then there is no concept in law of holder of public office
Holder of public office will remain until the public office remains
Where there is no public office in existence, there remains nothing on which de facto doctrine could be applied.
Common and pre-dominant feature of de facto doctrine is in relation to exercise of power by holder of the public office, when it is found to be not legally entitled to exercise or perform such power of public office
Such exercise of power is saved on principle of de facto doctrine on the sound principles of public policy and to maintain regularity in conduct of public business and to save the public from confusion and to protect the right which a person may have acquired as a result of exercise of power by holder of public office not entitled to perform or exercise such power
Necessary ingredients for de facto exercise of power by the holder of public office is that the office should exist in the first place
If there is no public office in existence then there is no concept in law of holder of public office
Holder of public office will remain until the public office remains
Where there is no public office in existence, there remains nothing on which de facto doctrine could be applied.
De facto doctrine was an established principle invoked by the superior courts to bring regularity and prevent confusion in the conduct of public business which may be created by persons not legally entitled to perform such duties yet when such persons had continued to do so without any objection.
Illegality in appointment of Public Officer would not per se vitiate any order passed by him and that no such illegality could be allowed to be questioned in collateral proceedings.
Doctrine of de facto is based on higher consideration of public policy and is calculated to ensure continuity to avoid dislocation and to prevent confusion in the conduct of public affairs on the one hand, and the safeguard of public and private rights emerging from the de facto act of- officer performing functions of the State in the ordinary course, on the other
Doctrine of de facto is a well recognized rule embedded in the jurisprudence
Under the doctrine of de facto, bona fide acts in public interest performed by persons assuming authority, which turn out to be illegal, are assumed to have been performed by a de jure authority/person and are binding
Acts of officers de facto performed by them within the scope of their assumed official authority in the interest of public or third person and not for their own benefit, are generally as valid and binding as if they were the acts of officers de jure.
De facto, doctrine of De facto doctrine is intended to avoid confusion which may be created by acts of officers and persons not legally entitled to perform such duties and have in fact continued to do so without any objection.
Doctrine of de facto has no application to a person who has not been appointed to a post and starts functioning without any order, valid or invalid
Coram non judice functions performed by such a person would not qualify for validation under the de facto doctrine.
"De facto, doctrine of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13874
Precedents & Case Laws citing "De facto, doctrine of"
2002 C L D 46
ABDUL BASIT ZAHID and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus MODARABA AL‑TIJARAH and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1997 Lahore 683
Before Mansoor Alamgir Qazi, . Versus THE STA ‑Respondent
Court:1997 C L C' 970
Ch. MUHAMMAD AZAM CHEEMA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1994 P T D 309
INCOME TAX OFFICER, MIRPUR and 2 others Versus Ch. MUHAMMAD BASHIR
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)P L D 1984 Karachi 462
ABDUL SALAM QURESHI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT OF BANKING FOR SIND
Court: ‑‑ S. 5‑General Clauses Act (X of 1891), S. 3(15)‑District Judge Definition‑Qualification for appointment as Judge Special Banking Court‑Word "is" used in S. 5, Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance, 1979, to be construed liberally and should be read as "has been" as having the meaning in the past tense‑Person to be appointed as Judge Special Banking Court, Held, not necessarily should have been Judge of Principal civil Court of original jurisdiction on date of his appointment‑Person once actually acted as District Judge but con tinued to remain in that cadre was, therefore, qualified to constitute special Court‑Definition of District Judge in General Clauses Act, 1897, lost its significance in circumstances‑Orders, judgments and decrees were saved by de facto doctrine.‑Words and phrases‑Interpre tation of statutes.2022 P L C 82
MUHAMMAD SHABBIR and another Versus QUAID-E-AZAM UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chancellor, Islamabad and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2022 S C M R 487
MUHAMMAD SHABBIR and another — Appellants Versus QUAID-E-AZAM UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chancellor, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2005 Karachi 498
ABDUL KARIM BROHI — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: High Court1995 S C M R 1593
ISLAMABAD‑‑‑Appellant Versus NASIR AHMAD and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1997 PLC 81
PAKISTAN WAPDA HYDRO ELECTRIC CENTRAL LABOUR UNION through its General Secretary, Lahore Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Manpower and Overseas Pakistanis (Labour Wing), Islamabad and 10 others
Court: Quetta high Court