Home Maxims & Terms Taxation Reserve meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Taxation Reserve

Taxation Reserve legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Definition not found in search database.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Taxation Reserve", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13930

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Taxation Reserve"

PTD 1989
I.T.R. No.4 of 1982, decided on 18th May 1989.

1989 P T D 1247

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus Messrs HABIB INSURANCE CO. Ltd.

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 1989
N/A

1989 P T D 1248

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL, KARACHI Versus Messrs ATLAS ASSURANCE CO. LTD., KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 1990
I.T.R. No. 37 of 1983, decided on 22nd November, 1989.

1990 P T D 402

C.I.T. CENTRAL ZONE A, KARACHI Versus Messrs ROYAL INSURANCE CO.

Court: Karachi High Court
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeals Nos.197 and 198-K of 1984, decided on 12th August, 1991.

1991 S C M R 2485

CENTRAL ZONE, `A', KARACHI — Appellant Versus Messrs PHOENIX ASSURANCE CO. LTD: — Respondent

Court: ----First Sched., R.6 & S.10(7)---Insurance Act (X of 1938), Ss.11, 15 18, 21 & 102---Jurisdiction of Income Tax Officer---Taxation reserve being not expenditure, Income Tax Officer had no jurisdiction to examine or exclude same from the profit and loss account and the Profit and Loss Appropriation Account approved by the Controller of Insurance under the Insurance Act, 1938---Finality was attached to the accounts submitted by the assessee insurance company under the Insurance Act, 1938 to the Controller of Insurance, and the limited jurisdiction vesting in the Income Tax Officer was only to exclude expenditure from the balance profit in such accounts which was not permissible under S.10 of Income Tax Act, 1922---Income Tax Officer was not competent to upset the integrity of the accounts submitted by the assessee under the Insurance Act, 1938 by applying the ordinary rules for computation of profits and gains and for assessment of tax thereon in the light of provisions of Income Tax Act, 1922 in respect of the income in regard to the head `business'---If the item in question did not in substance and essence constitute expenditure, it would be out of power of Income Tax Officer to apply the provisions of First Schedule, R.6, Income Tax Act, 1922 to exclude and addback the same to the balance of profits in order to bring it within tax net- -Jurisdiction.
PTD 1991
Civil Appeals Nos.197 and 198-K of 1984, decided on 12th August, 1991.

1991 P T D 1028

KARACHI — Appellant Versus Messrs PHOENIX ASSURANCE CO. LTD. — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2002
W.T.As. Nos.453/LB and 454/LB of 1996, decided on 11th September, 2001.

2002 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1981
N/A

1981 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: High Court
PTD 1992
No. 47 of 1991, decided on 17th May, 1992.

1992 P T D 1177

Messrs HOME INSURANCE CO. LTD., KARACHI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES RANGE III, KARACHI I.T.C.

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 1980
E. D. A. No. 5/KB of 1978‑79, decided on 8th May, 1979.

1980 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal
PTD 1994
I.T.R. No. 260 of 1988, decided on 31st March, 1993.

1994 P T D 498

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL ZONE A, KARACHI Versus Messrs MERCANTILE FIRE & GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court