Principle of Law
Principle of Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Definition not found in search database.
"Principle of Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13936
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Principle of Law"
2009 C L C 440
HASHIM KHALIL KHAN — Petitioner Versus VIIITH CIVIL AND FAMILY JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARACHI SOUTH and another — Respondents
Court: Karachi2004 Y L R 885
AHMAD NAWAZ and 2 others — Petitioners Versus AKHTAR HUSSAIN and another — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1981 Supreme Court 106
PROF. MUHAMMAD HANIF TAHIR‑Petitioner Versus The STATE‑Respondent
Court: S--.350 as amended by Criminal Procedure Code (Second Amendment) Ordinance (VIII of 1980‑No principle of law enjoins hearing of a case only by such Court as has taken down evidence‑Even if any principle existed to contrary same taken away by amendment in S. 350‑Successor Court even though not having taken down evidence, held, now per mitted to proceed with case without recording fresh evidence and it makes no difference whether immediate successor or successor of immediate successor howlowsoever disposes of case.1999SCMR2690
Dr. ABDUL MALIK IRFANI — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2004 C L C 643
MUHAMMAD BAKHSH and 13 others — Petitioners Versus JAMAL and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2002 Y L R 2772
ABDUL HAMEED‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2007 M L D 1486
KAMRAN ALI SIKANDAR and 2others — Applicants Versus THE STATE through III-Additional District Sessions Judge Malir, Karachi 2 and others — Respondents
Court: Karachi1984 P L C 569
MESSRS AEG-TELEFUNKEN PAKISTAN LTD. Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind1993CLC867
Dr. ABDUL MALIK IRFANI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, through Secretary, Ministry of Law
Court: Federal Sharlat Court1968 P Cr
FAROOQ AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM SHABBIR AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court