Home Maxims & Terms Substitution of Law meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Substitution of Law

Substitution of Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

Definition not found in search database.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Substitution of Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13943

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Substitution of Law"

YLR 2000
Constitutional Petition No. 610‑D of 1996, decided on 22nd September, 1999,

2000 Y L R 2655

MEHRAN SECURITY SERVICE (PVT.) LTD. and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLC(CS) 2016
Civil Appeals Nos.65, 66, 254 of 2014, 9, 123 and 93 of 2015, decided on 19th May, 2015.

2016 P L C (C

TASKEEN NAZ Versus FEHMIDA BEGUM and 11 others

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
YLRN 2018
Writ Petition No. 1945 of 2016, decided on 15th March, 2017.

2018 Y L R Note 29

MUHAMMAD BASHIR KIANI — Petitioner Versus STATE through Advocate-General Azad Jammu and Kashmir and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
PLD 1982
Intra‑Court Appeal No. 109 of 1982, decided on 4th July, 1982.

P L D 1982 Lahore 729

UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB AND 2 OTHERS‑‑Petitioners Versus REHMATULLAH‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑ Art. 9 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199; Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S. 3 and General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 8(1)‑Interpretation of statutes‑Right to appeal‑Art. 9 of Provisional Constitution Order, 1981 admittedly being substitute of Art. 199 of 1973 Constitution and provisions of Art. 199 being re enacted with modification in Art. 9 of Order, principle of construction laid down in S. F(1), General Clauses Act, 1897, attracted, viz. reference in any other enactment to provisions so repealed. (unless a different intention appears) to be construed as reference to provisions so re‑enacted and on such principle no need arose to amend S. 3 of Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972‑Legislature .if really intended to take away right of appeal it could have easily stated so in Art. 9 itself as it did in order to abridge jurisdiction‑Contention that Law maker by enacting Provisional Constitution Order, 1981, intended to take away right of appeal against orders passed under Art. 9 of such Order, held, not correct.‑Interpretation of statutes‑Appeal (civil).
PLC(CS) 1981
N/A

1980 P L C 796

EMPLOYEES' UNION Versus MSSERS GOLDEN INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind
PLC(CS) 1990
Constitutional Petition No. D-923 of 1989, decided on 4th October, 1989.

1990 P L C (C

ZAFAR IQBAL Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others

Court: Karachi High Court
SCMR 2005
Civil Appeal No. 1037 of 1999, decided on 29th November, 2004.

2005 S C M R 394

NIAZ MUHAMMAD and others ‑‑‑ Petitioners Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, QUETTA and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1970
Civil Rules Nos. 83 and 84 of 1966, decided on 2nd February 1968.

P L D 1970 Dacca 383

Appellants‑Petitioners Versus BRAJA LAL MONDAL AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 1989
Writ Petition No. 68 of 1989, decided on 19th February, 1989

1989 P L C (C

Dr. MANSOOR AKHTAR Versus SECRETARY, HEALTH and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. 2676 of 1977, decided on 22nd January 1978.

P L D 1978 Lahore 1357

Miss ALKA HUSSAIN-Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF PANJAB Etc.-Respondents

Court: