Home Maxims & Terms Construction of Statute meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Construction of Statute

Construction of Statute legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2019 PTD 381 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Construction of statuteBeneficial legislation, curative statutes and remedial statutesRetrospective effect of legislationPrinciplesScope

Beneficial legislation was a statute which purported to confer a benefit on individuals or a class of persons by relieving them of onerous obligations under contracts entered into by them or which tend to protect persons against oppressive acts from individuals with whom they stood in certain relations

Curative statutes were those which attempted to correct errors in proceedings particularly which sought to give effect to contracts and other transactions between private persons which otherwise would fail to produce their intended consequences on account of some statutory disability or a failure to comply with some technical requirements

Remedial statutes, on the other hand, were enacted to improve a prior enactment for some of its defects or to reform existing law to meet new situations covered by the enactment

Remedial legislation was made to supply such defects and abridge such superfluities in the Common Law as arose, either from the general imperfection of all human laws, from change of time and circumstances, from the mistake and unadvised determinations of unlearned (and even learned) Judges, or from any other cause whatever

While retroactive legislation is looked upon with disfavour, however, beneficial enactments were to be given liberal construction and retrospective effect if same were curative or remedial

In absence of express words to the contrary, remedial and curative enactments were not ordinarily construed to destroy vested rights, create new liabilities and obligations or disturb past and closed transaction.

2010 SCMR 1254 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Construction of statutePrinciple

Method of construction of statute is not to take particular words and give them a preconceived meaning, which one may have to displace or modify

Statute is to be read as a whole and ask oneself the question, in this statute, in this context, relating to the subject matter, what is the true meaning of the word

Statute is not open to construct as a matter of course, it is open only where language used in Statute requires interpretation i.e. where the Statute is ambiguous or bears two or more constructions or is of such doubtful obscure meaning that reasonable minds might be uncertain or disagree as to its meaning.

1957 PLD 459 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Construction of Statute Construction of Statute-Principles of. The golden rule is that the words of statute must prima facie be given their ordinary meaning Court ought to give the words of statute their plain, literal and natural meaning where it does not see from its scope that such meaning would be inconsistent or would lead to manifold injustice.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Construction of Statute", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13958

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Construction of Statute"

PLC(CS) 1996
C.P.S.LA No. 162-P of 1995, decided on 24th July, 1995.

1996 P L C (C

AMANULLAH KHAN Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P. and 2 others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1995
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 162‑P of 1995, decided on 24th July, 1995.

1995 S C M R 1856

AMANULLAH KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2025
2025-February-18

2025 C L C 1791

ALI AKBAR — Petitioner Versus ABDUL JABBAR and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh (Mirpurkhas Bench)
PLD 2016
N/A

P L D 2016 Supreme Court 514

DILAWAR HUSSAIN and others — Appellants Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1996
Civil Tax References Nos. 18, 21, 22 and 23 of 1989, decided on 12th March, 1996.

1996 P T D 1138

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE-B, LAHORE Versus MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ KHAN

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS)N 2023
Writ Petition No.3111-P of 2020, decided on 26th January, 2021.

2023 P L C (C

SIRAJ MUHAMMAD Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Addl. Attorney General and 4 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
SCMR 1998
Civil Petition No .191‑K of 1998, decided on 8th July, 1998.

1998 S C M R 2207

Messrs STATE CEMENT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN LTD. ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2001
Constitutional Petition No.D-646 of 1999; decided on 22nd March, 2001.

2001 P T D 2982

Messrs USMANI ASSOCIATES SUB PROPRIETARY FIRM Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and another

Court: Karachi High Court
CLC 2016
2015-December-22

2016L238

Messrs MEGA STEEL MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Environmental Protection Department, Punjab, Lahore and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2016
2015-December-22

2016 C L D 1097

Messrs MEGA STEEL MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED through Chief Executive/Director — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Environmental Protection Department,

Court: Lahore