Home Maxims & Terms Islamabad Oustees Scheme meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Islamabad Oustees Scheme

Islamabad Oustees Scheme legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1998 SCMR 2636 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 10Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)Islamabad Oustees Scheme, Sched.Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908). S.11Suppression of facts by petitioner in his civil suitEffectPrinciple of res judicataApplicability

Petitioner claiming proprietary rights in land in question had been non-suited by Board of Revenue as also by the High Court

Petitioner in subsequent round of litigation had suppressed factum of order of High Court in his plaint

High Court's positive finding in earlier round of litigation about disentitlement of petitioner to the grant of ownership rights would not entitle him to re-agitate the same matter in Civil Court

Suit was positively hit by principle of res judicata and Civil Court could not have re-opened the same controversy since eligibility and claim of petitioner haul been finally decided of to the highest level

Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances.

[Res judicata].

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Islamabad Oustees Scheme", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/13980

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Islamabad Oustees Scheme"

CLC 2002
R. O. R. No. 1013 of 1999, decided on 19th December, 2000.

2002 C L C 1992

Mst. KHALIS BIBI‑‑ ‑Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER, MULTAN DIVISION MULTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
MLD 1997
1995-March-8

1997 M L D 2587

Mst. SABIRA — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
MLD 1985
Writ Petition No. 316 of 1984, decided on 26th March, 1984.

1985 M L D 1270

FATEH MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1992
1991-November-12

P L D 1992 Supreme Court 37

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and others — Petitioners Versus HASHMAT ALI and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2004
Civil Petition No.2147‑L of 1999, decided on 5th July, 2002.

2004 S C M R 779

AHMED DIN and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1984
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1426 of 1983, decided on 9th May, 1984.

1984 S C M R 1191

MANZOORA-Petitioner Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, KABIRWALA AND OTHERS- Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2005
17.th March, 2004

2005 C L C 33

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ and 6 others — Petitioners Versus ZAFAR IQBAL and 9 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1998
Civil Petition .for Leave to Appeal No. 1344‑L of 1996, decided on 8th June. 1998.

1998 S C M R 2636

SHER MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector. Vehari and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1991
Civil Revision No.2815 of 1989, decided on 27th February, 1991.

1991CLC1640

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus HASHMAT ALI and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2006
N/A

2006 Y L R 313

Mst. CHANAN BIBI and 6 others — Petitioners Versus IMTIAZ and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore