Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Final Order meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Final Order

Final Order legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1997 SCMR 1901 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Final OrderIngredientsOrder passed by the Authority in excess of jurisdiction or without jurisdiction was not a final order

Such order does not require to be set aside and can simply be ignored if pressed into service.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Final Order", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14051

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Final Order"

PLC(CS) 1994
rn similar circumstances, another case of Ms. Sarosh Sultan v. Mr. Ghulam Haider Wyne, the Chief Minister, Punjab, Lahore (Appeal No. 442(R)/92, decided on 2‑3‑1993) came up before this Tribunal in which the above‑cited cases were dealt with and it was held that order of suspension cannot be interfered till a final decision is made by the competent authority and attains finality. That decision of the Tribunal has been upheld by the Supreme Court.

1994 P L C (C

HASNAIN ZAFAR HASHMI Versus CHAIRMAN, AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD,

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
MLD 2022
2021-December-20

2022 M L D 1720

MUHAMMAD LIAQAT ALI — Petitioner Versus MAJID ALI and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2012
2011-April-26

P L D 2012 Supreme Court (AJ&K) 21

Kashmir, Muzaffarabad — Appellant Versus SAIN GHULAM AHMED NISAR and 38 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2020
2020-February-19

2020 M L D 1523

ABDUL HAYEE — Petitioner Versus Mst. HALEEMA and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1990
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 8 of 1989, decided on 30th January, 1990.

P L D 1990 Supreme Court 709

Messrs NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE Co. Ltd.‑‑ ‑Petitioner Versus Messrs HOECHST PAKISTAN Ltd. and others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court:
PLD 1960
Applications for Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court, Nos. 91 and 92 of 1959, decided on 19th February 1960.

P L D 1960 Dacca 709

Khan Bahadur Haji BADI AHMED CHOWDHURY — Petitioner Versus THE UNITED BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS — Opposite‑Parties

Court:
CLD 2014
2014-March-17

2014 C L D 1596

MUHAMMAD KHAN — Appellant Versus ZARAI TARAKIATI BANK LIMITED through President — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1960
Applications for Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court Nos. 28 and 29 of 1957, decided on 25th March 1938.

P L D 1960 Dacca 750

Haji BADI AHMED‑Petitioner Versus UNITED BANK OF INDIA LTD. AND OTHERS‑ — Opposite‑Parties

Court:
PLC(CS) 1991
Appeal No. 98(K) of 1985, decided on 4th April, 1990.

1991 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ANIS QURESHI Versus THE DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONES and 3 others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
YLR 2010
Writ Petition No.1395 of 2008, decided on 13th May, 2009.

2010 Y L R 109

MUHAMMAD SAFDAR — Petitioner Versus RENT TRIBUNAL AHMEDPUR EAST and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library