Home Maxims & Terms Tax meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Tax

Tax legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2005 PLD 55 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
"Tax""Fee""Cess"

Distinction.

2003 CLC 513 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Tax"

Meaning. Webster's Unabridged Dictionary of English Language; Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Edn.; The Oxford Dictionary Fourth Edn. and Ahmad Khan v. The Chief Justice and the Judges of the High Court, West Pakistan, through the Registrar, High Court of West Pakistan, Lahore and 2 others PLD 1968 SC 171 ref.

1999 SCMR 1402 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases

Tax" and "fee" and distinction.

1999 MLD 2889 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesTax" and "fee"DistinctionTax is levied as a part of common burden, while fee is a payment for special benefit, privilege or services

In the case of a fee, it is the special benefit or privilege accruing to an individual which is the reason for its payment, whereas in case of a tax the particular advantage, if the same exists at all, is an incidental result of a State action

Prohibition levied by a statute amounts to a fee or tax will always be a question of fact to be determined in the circumstances of each case.

1999 YLR 1247 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Tax " and "fee "Distinction

Tax is levied as part of a common burden whereas fee is levied because of certain benefits derived by the person on whom it is levied.

1999 PLC(CS) 1173 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Fee" and "tax"

Distinction.

1998 CLC 1912 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Cess""Tax"

Distinction.

1992 SCMR 750 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Fee" and "Tax"

Distinction.

1990 CLC 197 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Words "Fees" and 'Taxes"Distinction

While imposition of a tax being essentially a burden, and having no element of any quid pro quo, charge of "fees" must be co-relative with rendition of some services which need neither be commensurate with an advantage to the person charged, nor necessarily uniform.

1986 CLC 533 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Word 'tax'Meaning and scope

Tax, held, was a rate or sum of money assessed on person or property of-citizen by Government for use of the nation or State

Tax was compulsory exaction of money by public authority for public purposes enforceable by law and was contribution imposed by Government on individuals for services of the State.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Tax", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1406

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Tax"

SCMR 1971
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 101‑D of 1970, decided on 21st November 1970.

1971 S C M R 134

MESSRS Haji NAZIMUDDIN MD. AMANULLAH AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, DACCA ZONE, DACCA‑Respondent

Court: Sales Tax Act (III of 1951), S. 5 (1) read with Income‑tax Act (XI of 1922), S. 2 (7) as amended‑Person appointed as "Examin ing Officer" under Income‑tax Act, 1922‑A Sales Tax Officer as well under Sales Tax Act, 1951.
PTD 1971
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 101‑D of 19711, decided on 21st November 1970.

1971 P T D 182

MESSRS Haji NAZIMUDDIN MD. AMANULLAH AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, DACCA ZONE, DACCA‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court Pakistan
PTD 2015
I.T.A. No.194 of 2000, decided on 30th September, 2014.

2015 P T D 545

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, RAWALPINDI — Appellant Versus Mrs. NAHEED MUJTABA — Respondent

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1998
I.T.As. Nos. 1545/KB to 1548/KB of 1997-98, decided on 20th May, 1998.

1998 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2023
Civil Appeal No. 1422 of 2019, decided on 12th January, 2023.

2023 P T D 320

The COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI Versus Messrs ATTOCK CEMENT PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2023
Civil Appeal No. 1422 of 2019, decided on 12th January, 2023.

2023 S C M R 279

The COMMISSIONER, INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI — Appellant Versus Messrs ATTOCK CEMENT PAKISTAN LIMITED, KARACHI — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2003
I.T.As. Nos.836/LB to 838/LB of 2002,'decided on 3rd August, 2002.

2003 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2004
W.T.As. Nos. 72/KB and 73/KB of 2003, decided on 4th December, 2003.

2004 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2025
Writ Petitions Nos. 181 of 2019, 4497 and 4558 of 2022, decided on 18th December, 2024.

2025 P T D 1364

Messrs PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY through Director (Budget and Accounts) and others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN for the purpose of service through Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Islamabad and 3 others

Court: Islamabad High Court
PTD 2015
P.T.R. No.276 of 2014, decided on 10th November, 2014.

2015 P T D 863

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Versus Messrs PEPCO PAKISTAN.

Court: Lahore High Court