Home Maxims & Terms Security meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Security

Security legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 SCMR 1955 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Arts. 175(3) & 204Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003), S. 4(2)District judiciarySecurityMarshalls of the Court

Importance of district judiciary to have its own security personnel independent from the district administration and police highlighted.

2018 PLD 504 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 2(i), 7, 9 & 12Vulnerable establishmentSecurityPetitioner was a cellular phone service provider and had set up several Base Transceiver Stations (BTS) towersPetitioner was aggrieved of notices issued by authorities to comply with security arrangements of BTS towersValidity

Petitioner did not fall under the definition of 'vulnerable establishment' because BTS towers were not notified under Punjab Security of Vulnerable Establishment Act, 2015, as vulnerable establishments

High Court directed the authorities not to harass and take coercive measures against petitioner in violation of applicable law and in absence of notification declaring the petitioner as a vulnerable establishment

Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.

1990 SCMR 524 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
SecuritySecurity has to be free from any encumbrances and satisfy the Court objectively

Security should be such as is easily disposable and amount secured under it conveniently realizable.

1986 SCMR 135 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 185(3)AppealSecurity

No one appearing in the response show cause notice issued for not depositing security-Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.

1984 SCMR 634 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 12(5)-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIV, r. 4 . & O. XXXVII, r. 3-Security -Adequacy of-Parties agreeing that objection with regard to adequacy of mortgage security to be treated as security for purposes of S. 12(5) of Ordinance be determined and examined afresh by High Court-Such fresh determination considered to be just and equitable in order to do complete justice between parties-Orders passed by High Court in pending appeals accordingly set aside and cases, remanded for examining sufficiency and adequacy of value of mortgage security vis-a-vis decretal amount.

1957 PLD 12 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent
Security

Order for, for "the due prosecution of appeal and the payment of costs-Whether cash deposit not sufficient compliance-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) O. XLV, r. 7.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Security", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14064

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Security"

SCMR 1992
Civil Appeal No.104‑P of 1990, decided on 26th May, 1992.

1992 S C M R 1731

UNITED BANK LIMITED‑‑‑Appellant Versus P.I.C.I.C. and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC 2015
Constitutional Petition No.D-1346 and C.M.A. No.8020 of 2012, decided on 16th May, 2014.

2015 P L C 72

M.R. INDUSTRIES through Managing Partner Versus SINDH EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION through Commissioner and 3 others

Court: Sindh High Court
PLD 1988
High Court Appeal No.176 of 1986, decided on 21st August, 1988.

P L D 1988 Karachi 628

USMAN HUSSAIN‑‑Appellant Versus HABIB BANK Ltd, and 4 others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑S.12(5)‑‑Non‑deposit of decretal amount in Court before admission of appeal‑‑Security furnished to bank for repayment of loan amount whether to be treated as security for purpose of admitting appeal‑‑Word "security"‑‑Meaning, scope and import of‑‑Appellant could present an appeal without depositing of decretal amount or furnishing security .an equal value to such amount, but he could not seek admission of appeal without either depositing amount of judgment debt or at the discretion of Court furnishing of security equivalent to such amount‑ Word "security" used in S.12(5) would include any security equivalent to the amount of judgment debt to the satisfaction of Court‑‑Security would also include that security which was originally accepted against the loan.‑‑Word and phrases,
PLC 2026
Writ Petition No.1229 of 2012, decided on 16th October, 2025.

2026 P L C 41

TELENOR PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. Versus EMPLOYEES OLD AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION

Court: Islamabad High Court
CLD 2020
2020-February-25

2020 C L D 619

SIEMENS PAK ENGINEERING — Petitioner Versus JAPAN POWER GENERATION LIMITED and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 1998
Miscellaneous Appeals Nos. 17 and 18 of 1994, decided on 19th June, 1997.

1998 PLC 115

SINDH EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION Versus Messrs CORN PAK LTD. and another

Court: Karachi High Court
MLD 1993
J. Misc. No.87 of 1989, decided on 5th April, 1993.

1993 M L D 1562

NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION‑‑‑Petitioner Versus M/s. RAWAL PAPERS (PVT.) LTD.‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PTD 1985
Income‑tax Reference Application No. 99 of 1973, decided on 10th October, 1984.

1985 P T D 329

Messrs GRINDLAYS BANK Ltd. Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 1972
26th April 1971

P L D 1972 Karachi 41

Miscellaneous Application No. 35 of 1968

Court: High Court
PLD 1988
High Court Appeal No.176 of 1986, decided on 4th March, 1988.

P L D 1988 Karachi 404

USMAN HUSSAIN‑‑Appellant Versus HABIB BANK LTD. and 4 others‑‑Respondents

Court: