Landlord
Landlord legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
Person who was receiving rent and' signing receipts as the person entitled to receive the same would be a landlord.
S. 13(2) (vi) read with Ss. 2(c) & 13 (5-B)-Ejectment-Construction of building-Respondent stating to have been recovering rent from petitioner on behalf of his sons and relying upon necessary sanction for construction of building obtained by his sons (owners of property) in their own names-No contravention of provisions of Ordinance in circumstances spelt out-Petitioner's apprehension of being not protected under S. 13(5-Bl in case of default on part of respondent in erecting building-Held, unfounded and same undoubtedly available to petitioners in case of default.
"Landlord", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14069
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Landlord"
1985 C L C 562
M.S. KHAN — Appellant Versus S.M.SIRAJUDDIN — Respondent
Court: Karachi1984 M L D 178
Mrs. SUGHRA BEGUM and 6 others — Appellants Versus JALALUDDIN — Respondent
Court: Karachi1984 C L C 50
MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN SOOMRO‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1984 M L D 1159
SARWAR MAHMOOD — Appellant Versus JAMIL AHMED KHAN — Respondent
Court: Karachi1986 M L D 1299
HAFIZUR REHMAN Appellant Versus J.M. SOKLYN — Respondent
Court: Karachi1991 S C M R 846
MUHAMMAD BASHIR — Appellant Versus SAKHAWAT HUSSAIN — Respondent Civil Appeal No. 449-K in Civil Petition No.204-K of 1990, decided on 21st January, 1991.
Court: High Court2017 M L D 605
NISAR AHMED SHEIKH — Petitioner Versus VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DISTRICT SOUTH and another — Respondents
Court: Sindh1986 M L D 905
Syed. SHAMIMUL HASSAN NAQV1‑‑Appellant Versus NIAZ MUHAMMAD‑‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1984 Supreme Court 200
Court: -- S. 13(3)-Ejectment sought on ground of bona fide need of landlord and his children-Death of landlord does not necessarily result in abatement of ejectment proceedings vis-a-vis that ground--Landlord can obtain possession of premises from tenant independently on ground that premises was required for use of his children--Death of landlord whether materially alters position would depend upon facts and circumstances of each case-Deceased landlord (Doctor)' not seeking possession of premises for exclusive use of his son but his claim was . that further accommodation was required by him for purpose of extension of- his clinic which could be run jointly by himself, and his doctor son--Held, it was clear that case set up was that son would join in business not only in , premises in dispute but in entire buildi4 including disputed portion when it is annexed to form part of whole establishment-Death of landlord, therefore, does not necessarily affect in case of personal requirement for joint use of landlord and his children.-Abatement.
1997 M L D 3240
Haji KASSAM through Legal Heirs‑ ‑‑Appellants Versus Syed RAHIM SHAH‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi