Home Maxims & Terms Letter Rogatory meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Letter Rogatory

Letter Rogatory legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1994 SCMR 285 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Letter RogatoryMeaning

Such letter is a formal communication in writing by a Court in which action is pending to a foreign Court or Judge requesting the testimony of a witness residing within the jurisdiction of that foreign Court

Indian Criminal Procedure Code (II of 1974), S. 166-A.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Letter Rogatory", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14114

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Letter Rogatory"

SCMR 1994
Criminal Appeal No.567 of 1992, decided on 17th December, 1992.

1993 S C M R 285

UNION OF INDIA and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus W. N. CHADHA‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of India
PTD 2000
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.767 of 1997, decided on 11th February, 1998.

2000 P T D 2630

KANPUR INCOME-TAX BAR ASSOCIATION and another Versus UNION OF INDIA and others

Court: 236 I T R 848
PLD 1999
1999-April-15

P L D 1999 Lahore 535

THE STATE — Complainant Versus Mohtarama BENAZIR BHUTTO and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2010
2009-December-16

P L D 2010 Supreme Court 1

Dr. MOBASHIR HASSAN and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2025
2024-December-3

P L D 2025 Islamabad 274

AMAN ULLAH KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1999
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.208 of 1998, decided on 4th March, 1999.

1999 S C M R 1447

OPPOSITION, BILAWAL HOUSE, KARACHI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1957
the facts in each case. As a general rule, the important witnesses on whose testimony the case against the accused person has to be established, must be examined in Court and usually the issuing of a commission should be restricted to formal witnesses or such witnesses who could not be produced without an amount of delay or inconvenience unreasonable in the circumstances of the case

P L D 1957 Supreme Court (Ind

DHARMANAND PANT‑Appellant Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1999
1999-April-2

P L D 1999 Supreme Court 937

Mohtarma BENAZIR BHUTTO — Appellant Versus THE STATE

Court: High Court