Statutory Corporation
Statutory Corporation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Appellant company was aggrieved of order passed by Single Judge of High Court declaring petitions filed by respondents as maintainable
Plea raised by appellant company was that it (Company) was not under control of Federal Government and could not be construed as "person" in terms of Art. 199(5) of the Constitution
Validity
Appellant company fell within defined category of 'person' performing functions in connection with affairs of Federation under Art. 199(1)(a)(ii) read with Art. 199(5) of the Constitution
High Court had jurisdiction to intervene under Art. 199 of the Constitution
Division Bench of High Court declined to interfere in order passed by the Single Judge of High Court
Intra-court appeal was dismissed in circumstances.
What the statute creating the corporation does not expressly or impliedly authorize is to betaken to be prohibited.
What the statute creating the corporation does not expressly or impliedly authorize is to be taken to be prohibited.
Legal position obtaining in respect of employees of statutory Corporation stated.
"Statutory Corporation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14137
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Statutory Corporation"
P L D 1973 Karachi 302
ANSAR AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, KARACHI‑Respondent
Court: High Court2000 P T D 3290
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus N. J. PAVRI
Court: 237 I T R 472P L D 1979 Karachi 542
PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION, KARACHI AND 4 OTHERS-Applicants Versus ALLAH DITTA BUGTI-Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1976 Karachi 778
MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN‑Petitioner Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI -Respondent
Court: ‑‑ Art. 199‑Writ‑"Public office"‑Post of Research Officer, State Bank of Pakistan‑Not a public or statutory office, neither created by nor mentioned in State Bank of Pakistan Act‑Incumbent of such office not performing any delegated sovereign function of Government for benefit of public‑Held, writ petition by such person not maintain able.‑Writ.1997 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD MUNAWAR QURESHI Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Court: Lahore High Court2016 S C M R 931
HAROON-UR-RASHID — Appellant Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1962 (W
SALAH MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ROZ AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:1980 P L C (C
KHURSHID HASSAN SIDDIQUI Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Court: Karachi1994 P L C (C
Agha SHAFIQUE AHMED KHAN Versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES and others
Court: Karachi High Court1995 S C M R 879
PAKISTAN TELEVISION CORPORATION LTD. and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GHULAM HAIDER BADINI and 530 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan