Home Maxims & Terms Post Office Manual meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Post Office Manual

Post Office Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1995 PLC(CS) 106 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
R. 38Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)SeniorityChange of cadreEffectCivil servant's appointment as Inspector of Post Offices in the Southern Circle

Civil servant after three years, was transferred on his own request, to the 'L' Circle, where he was placed at the bottom in the seniority list of the Inspectors as per requirement of R. 38, Post Offices Manual, Vol. IV

Civil servant was assigned position in accordance with said rule as per gradation list of subsequent years

Civil servant's seniority was, however, refixed on his representation and, thus, he became senior to respondent

Service Tribunal on appeal of respondent placed civil servant at his original place in the gradation list

Validity

Order of Service Tribunal did not suffer from any infirmity

Civil servant by seeking transfer from one circle to another had voluntarily surrendered benefits of his service in his parent circle in the matter of seniority

Civil servant could not now turn back to say that he should be given advantage of his previous service for the reason that the cadre of Superintendents of Post Offices had been declared a circle cadre

Such declaration in fact, could hardly have any bearing on his seniority in the circle

Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances.

1994 SCMR 1672 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Post Office ManualR. 38Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)SeniorityChange of cadreEffectCivil servant's appointment as Inspector of Post Offices in the Southern Circle

Civil servant after three years, was transferred on his own request, to the 'L' Circle, where he was placed at the bottom in the seniority list of the Inspectors as per requirement of R. 38, Post Offices Manual, Vol. IV

Civil servant was assigned position in accordance with said rule as per gradation fist of subsequent years

Civil servant's seniority was, however, refixed on his representation and, thus, he became senior to respondent

Service Tribunal on appeal of respondent placed civil servant at his original place in the gradation list

Validity

Order of Service Tribunal did not suffer from any infirmity

Civil servant by seeking transfer from one circle to another had voluntarily surrendered benefits of his service in his parent circle in the matter of seniority

Civil servant could not now turn back to say that he should be given advantage of his previous service for the reason that the cadre of Superintendents of Post Offices had been declared a circle cadre

Such declaration in fact, could hardly have any bearing on his seniority in the circle

Leave to appeal was refused in circumstances.

1982 PLC(CS) 1036 LABOUR-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Post Office ManualR. 37Transfer

Naib-Qasid/orderly cannot be transferred to any place other than his home district-Appointment of appellant as orderly to inspector Post Office `B' (his home district)-Office of Inspector Post Office `B' temporarily located at `H' hence appellant posted at `H'

Transfer of appellant as Chokidar at B, held, competent.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Post Office Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14144

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Post Office Manual"

SCMR 1994
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1323‑L of 1993, decided on 15th December,1993.

1994 S C M R 1672

MUHAMMAD MUNIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Rana UMAR HAYAT and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1995
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1323‑L of 1993, decided on 15th December, 1993.

1995 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD MUNIR Versus Rana UMAR HAYAT and 2 others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2004
Writ Petition No. 424 of 2003, decided on 27th February, 2004.

2004 Y L R 1736

Engineer IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHILJ1‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY POST MASTER GENERAL, AZAD KASHMIR REGION and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J&K
SCMR 2026
Criminal Petitions Nos. 143 and 359 of 2023, decided on 3rd October, 2025.

2026 S C M R 145

MUHAMMAD RASHID and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE through DAG and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2012
Writ Petition No.8657 of 2011, decided on 11th October, 2011.

2012 P L C (C

AMAAR NAZIR QURESHI Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL PAKISTAN POST and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLCN 2019
N/A

2019 C L C Note 40

NASIR SHARIF — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL through LRS and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 2022
Civil Petition No. 342-K of 2020, decided on 13th May, 2022.

2022 P L C (C

The POSTMASTER GENERAL SINDH PROVINCE, KARACHI and others Versus SYED FARHAN

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2022
Civil Petition No. 342-K of 2020, decided on 13th May, 2022.

2022 S C M R 1154

The POSTMASTER GENERAL SINDH PROVINCE, KARACHI and others — Petitioners Versus SYED FARHAN — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1985
Criminal Petition No. 69 of 1985, decided on 10th June, 1985.

1985 S C M R 1907

MUBARIK ALI — Petitioner Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 1982
Appeal No. HYD 82 of 1982, decided on 22nd April, 1982.

1982 P L C 1036

RIAZ AHMAD KHAN Versus M. AKHTAR. INSPECTOR POST OFFICE B‑1DIN AND ANOTHER

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind