Home Maxims & Terms Deem meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Deem

Deem legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1993 SCMR 745 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Deem"

Word is commonly used to create legal fiction and introduce an artificial conception.

1973 PLD 164 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases -Word "deemed"-Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Deem", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14166

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Deem"

SCMR 2025
Civil Appeals Nos. 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2034 of 2022, Civil Appeals Nos. 308, 503 of 2023, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 3468-L, 3477-L, 1917-L, 1918-L, 2149-L, 2150-L, 2607-L, 2608-L, 2788-L, 2789-L, 2790-L of 2022, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeals Nos. 905-L, 1463-L, 1464-L, 1465-L of 2023, 3665-L of 2022, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 2352-L, 2353-L, 2354-L, 3177-L, 3399-L, 3400-L of 2023, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos.106-L, 1155-L, 1268-L, 1450-L of 2024, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 216-L of 2025, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeals Nos. 156-L of 2024, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal No. 2627-L of 2023, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeals Nos. 3659-L, 3660-L, 3661-L, 3662-L of 2022, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeals Nos. 3327-L, 3328-L, 3329-L, 3330-L, 431-L, 3014-L of 2023, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal No. 2340 of 2024, Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeals Nos. 4583,.4584, 4585 of 2023, Civil Petition for Leave to Appeals Nos. 5359 and 531-L of 2024, decided on 5th June, 2025.

2025 S C M R 1521

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, SIALKOT and others — Appellants/Petitioners Versus Messrs WHITE GOLD STEEL MILLS, S.I.E. DASKA and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2002
Complaint No.755-K of 2001, decided on 26th January, 2002.

2002 P T D 2768

ALLAH DITTA ZAHID Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
PTD 1971
Civil Appeal No. 1188 of 1967, decided on 30th August 1968.

1971 P T D 924

LAXMIPAT SINGHANIA Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, U. P.

Court: Supreme Court India
PTD 1994
ITA No. 263/KB of 1992-93, decided on 28th February, 1993.

1994 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2003
I.T.A. No. 1713/KB of 1996‑97, decided on 28th October, 2002.

2003 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income‑tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 1979
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 189/M of 1979, decided on 6th May, 1979

P L D 1979 Lahore 810

HUSSAIN NAQI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: Ss. 3, 5 & 13 (2) read with Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958), S. 6-Option to get case transferred to Sessions Court-Charge-sheets, drawing up of-Charge already put to petitioner though not reduced into writing and signed by Court when petitioner's counsel appeared and made submission for transfer of case to Court of Session-Charge as such not deemed to have been framed-Special Judge however being a Court of Session while trying petitioner under Official Secrets Act, 1923, question of trial by another Court of Session, held, did not arise in circumstances.-Charge.
PTD 1995
MA.(Rect) No.9/KB of 1991-92, decided on 7th April, 1994.

1995 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2003
I.T.A. No.51 of 1998, decided on 16th December, 2002.

2003 P T D 1530

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/ WEALTH TAX, ZONE-C, LAHORE Versus Messrs HAROON MEDICAL STORE, SHEIKHUPURA

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 2005
Appeal No.2 of 2003, heard on 9th December, 2004.

P L D 2005 Lahore 190

SAADAT KHIYALI, EX‑CHIEF EDITOR, DAILY MASHRIQ, LAHORE and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus CITY COORDINATION OFFICER, CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, LAHORE‑‑‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1985
Civil Appeal No. Q-4 of 1985, decided on 10th April, 1985.

1985 S C M R 1978

MUHAMMAD AKBAR KHAN — Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN and another Respondents

Court: High Court