Formal defect
Formal defect legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
Expression "formal defect" is comprehensive enough to include various kinds of defects, including that of wrong description of property or fixing an incorrect jurisdictional value.
Meaning discussed.
O. XXIII, r. 1 read with S. 107 (2)-Vague description of property in suit-Issue contested and fought out in trial Court-Suit dismissed-Withdrawal of suit with liberty to bring fresh suit on same cause of action allowed by lower Appellate Court-Order of withdrawal set aside by High Court
Words and phrases-"Formal defect"-Meaning.
"Formal defect", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14185
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Formal defect"
P L D 1972 Lahore 290
TOWN COMMITTEE, DIPALPUR‑Petitioner Versus AHMAD DIN AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:1986 C L C 1316
AQAL HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ and 7 others‑‑Respondents
Court: Azad J & K2023 C L C 2042
Messrs BEST WAY CEMENT LTD. through Duly Authorized Representative — Petitioner Versus YASIR SALEEM and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)2023 M L D 1541
NAZIR AHMAD and 10 others — Petitioners Versus HASANULLAH and 17 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar (Mingora Bench)P L D 2026 Balochistan 57
GHULAM SARWAR — Petitioner Versus NASIR and 6 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1966 (W
NAZIR MOORAJ‑-Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD SULTAN KHAN‑Respondent
Court:2024 C L C 262
BISMILLAH and 2 others — Petitioners Versus NAIK MUHAMMAD through Legal Heirs — Respondents
Court: Balochistan2013 C L D 724
The BANK OF PUNJAB through Attorney — Applicant Versus Messrs ZEPHYR TEXTILE LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2014 M L D 233
The BANK OF PUNJAB through Attorney — Plaintiff Versus Messrs ZEPHYR TEXTILE LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer and 3 others — Defendants
Court: LahoreP L D 1957 (W
MUHAMMAD DIN‑Petitioner Versus ATTA MUHAMMAD and others‑Respondents
Court: High Court