Canons of Professional Conduct and Etiquette of Advocate
Canons of Professional Conduct and Etiquette of Advocate legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Duties of an Advocates in Islamic society enlisted.
Sui Southern Gas Company is public limited and incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, and is quoted on Stock Exchanges
Although the majority shares in the Company are held by the President of Pakistan, yet the same does not make the Company a department of Government of Pakistan
Insertion of S.2-A in Service Tribunals Act, 1973, does not in any way make employees of the Company civil servants or public functionaries to make them amenable to the Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court
Constitutional petition was not maintainable against the employees of Sui Southern Gas Company in circumstances.
Advocate is an officer of Court and is concerned in the proper administration of justice and owes an overriding duty to the Court, to the standards of his profession and to the public, to ensure that it is achieved
Where Advocate has not prepared his brief properly and has not placed the relevant law before the Court, such counsel has failed in his duty by not maintaining the standards expected of an Advocate
Where counsel does not come to the Court ready with the facts and law on the legal propositions, such lapse on his part would show disrespect to the standards of the profession, duty to the Court in the administration of justice and negligence of his duty to client
Such counsel has not only committed breach of the Injunctions of Islam but has also committed breach of promise to his client.
When a counsel signs, files or submits to the Court any application it is assumed that the application is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay, that the legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law and practice
Where a counsel succumbs to temptation of money offered by a client and .takes up a brief without ascertaining true facts and researching the law such counsel would be deemed to be a party to vexatious claim and his duty to the Court would be subordinated to his client.
Advocate is an officer of Court, and is concerned in the proper administration of justice and owes an overriding duty to the Court, to the standards of his profession and to the public, to ensure that it is achieved
Where Advocate has not prepared his brief properly and has not placed the relevant law before the Court, such counsel has failed in his duty by not maintaining the standards expected of an Advocate
Where counsel does not come to the Court ready with the facts and law on the legal propositions, such lapse on his part would show disrespect to the standards of the profession, duty to the Court in the administration of justice and negligence of his duty to client
Such counsel has not only committed breach of the Injunctions of Islam but has also committed breach of promise to his client.
"Canons of Professional Conduct and Etiquette of Advocate", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14202
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Canons of Professional Conduct and Etiquette of Advocate"
1999 C L C 105
MUHAMMAD LATIF‑‑‑Appellant Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1984 S C M R 1555
Malik NAWAB ALI BHATTI‑‑Petitioner Versus QAISER ALI and another‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court2000 Y L R 1102
MUHAMMAD AHSAN and 5 others‑‑‑Applicants Versus ALTAF HUSSAIN and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2016 S C M R 141
Syed ALI ZAFAR, ADVOCATE BAHRIA TOWN (PVT.) LTD. — Applicant Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2001 M L D 153
ABDUL HAMEED‑‑‑Decree‑Holder Versus Messrs PANHWAR CONSTRUCTION CO. and others‑‑‑Judgment‑Debtors
Court: Karachi1998 M L D 1389
SAMIR AHSAN ULLAH and another — Complainants Versus J.V. GARDNER, ADVOCATE — Respondent
Court: Pakistan Bar Council1992 P Cr
HABIBUR REHMAN — Applicant/Complainant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi1992 S C M R 1469
MIR HASAN — Petitioner Versus HABIBUR REHMAN and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2018 C L C 664
ABRAR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus VIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SOUTH KARACHI and 13 others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 2001 Karachi 20
MUHAMMAD DAWOOD KHAN — Decree-Holder Versus ELYAS AMEEN and others — Judgment-Debtors
Court: High Court