Home Maxims & Terms Marriage meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Marriage

Marriage legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2026 SCMR 1 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S.5MarriageEssence and meaningEssentials of a valid marriage statedMarriage under Islamic law is regarded both as an act of devotion (ibadat) and a social transaction (muamalat)

Marriage, like other contracts requires declaration and acceptance for its constitution and both must be expressed in such a manner as to demonstrate the intention, without any sort of ambiguity

The essential requirements of a valid marriage include offer (ijab) and acceptance (qabul), exchanged either directly or through representatives or guardians, along with free and informed consent

These elements align with the statutory requirements for a valid civil contract and marriage is now established under our jurisprudence to be a solemn civil contract ('aqd')

In Pakistan, every marriage solemnized under Muslim law must be registered under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 and the Nikahnama serves as the principal documentary proof.

2026 PLD 138 FEDERAL-CONSTITUTIONAL-COURT Judicial Precedent
MarriageInterfaith marriage

A Muslim male may validly contract marriage with a Christian woman (being from the Ahl al-Kitab).

2025 PLD 15 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
MarriageAbsence of proof of divorcePresumption

There is a presumption of marriage based on continued and prolonged cohabitation unless the same is dislodged by cogent reason.

2023 PLD 89 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
MarriageScopeHusband is given the right to divorce his wife, though of course arbitrary divorces are discountenanced

There is a saying of the Holy Prophet (Peace And Blessings Be Upon Him And His Family) to the effect that "the most detestable of lawful things in Allah's view is divorce"

Similarly, the wife is given the right to ask for khula in cases of extreme incompatibility.

2023 PLD 89 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
MarriageScopeMarriage among Muslims is in the nature of a civil contract

Such a contract undoubtedly has spiritual and moral overtones and undertones but legally, in essence, it remains a contact between the parties which can be the subject of dissolution for good cause.

2022 PLD 228 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Islamic lawMarriageMinorValidityHigh Court cannot pass declaration whether or not purported marriage contract between parties is valid or not

Doing so requires determining age of minor, which requires recording of evidence, and High Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot undertake such exercise.

2022 PLD 228 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
PreambleMarriageObject, purpose and scope

Contract of marriage is a contract whereby parties agree to engage in sexual relations, recognized by the State and society as legitimate, for the purpose of procreation

Consideration and object of a marriage contract essentially entails two individuals agreeing to engage in legitimate sexual relations, transforming individuals into a family warranting state protection

Relationship of marriage does not just entail engagement in permissible sexual conduct

Purpose of marriage is to enter into a contract whereby two people agree to become a family and look after one another, and further agree to bring children into this world and are responsible for safety and physical and emotional well being of such offspring.

2021 YLRN 105 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
MarriageScope

Presumption of valid marriage can be ascertained from the fact of acknowledgement by a man or woman as husband and wife.

2020 PLD 811 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
MarriageMarriage contracted for a minor by any guardian other than the father or father's fatherOption to repudiate marriage by minor on attaining the pubertyScope

Right to repudiation of marriage is lost, in case of a female, if after attaining puberty and after having been informed of the marriage and of her right to repudiate it, she does not repudiate without reasonable delay.

2020 CLC 549 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
MarriageNikahNo Wakeel appointed for bride

In the present case, the bride was well educated and more than 27 years of age at the time of Nikah, thus, she was competent enough to enter into Nikah with anybody according to her own whims even without intervention of a third person, in particular a Wakeel.

2020 CLC 549 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
MarriageNikahnama, contents ofTrivial irregularities

Such irregularities could not be used to negate the contents of a Nikahnama which being a public document carried presumption of correctness.

2020 CLC 549 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
MarriageNikahWitnesses to the Nikah not related to the bride

Only requirement of the law was presence of two male or one male and two female witnesses at the time of offer and acceptance irrespective of the fact that they were closely related to the parties or not

Furthermore since marriage between the parties in the present case was solemnized against wishes of their families it could not be believed that some immediate family members of the bride would have participated in the said marriage especially when there was great difference between the social/financial status of the parties.

2020 CLC 549 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
MarriageNikahEssentials pre-requisites

Three ingredients of a valid marriage were proposal, acceptance and presence of two male or one male and two female witnesses.

2020 CLC 549 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
MarriageRun-away marriagePlace of solemnization of NikahNikah Khawan clarified in his statement that he performed Nikah at his residence

According to the practice in vogue, Nikah was either arranged in the house of the bride, mosque or any wedding hall where the parties choose to celebrate their wedding, thus, solemnization of Nikah in the house of Nikah Khawan especially in the wake of the fact that it was run-away marriage, could not be disbelieved.

2020 CLC 549 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S.5MarriageNikahnama

Completion of entries in Nikahnama by a person other than the Nikah Khawan was allowed.

2020 PLD 443 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
MarriageIddat periodScope

Unlawful conjunction by way of marriage during iddat period renders the marriage irregular and not void and an irregular marriage becomes regular the moment the bottleneck is removed i.e. iddat period expires.

2020 CLC 1691 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
S.5 & Sched.Contract Act (IX of 1872), S.19Marriageconsent of womanNecessityScopeGuardian of womanResponsibilityScopeVoidability of agreement without free consentScopeGuardians are enjoined by Islam to get their daughters married after getting their consent

Consent of a woman is necessary; she cannot be compelled to enter into a marriage contract without her free will and consent

If a girl is married to a person who is not of her choice and girl signs the nikahnama unwillingly by force or fear of her guardian, the same cannot be termed as valid marriage, because guardian's consent is no substitute for the girl's consent.

2020 CLC 1691 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
S.5 & Sched.Contract Act (IX of 1872), S.19MarriageConceptVoidability of agreement without free consentScopeMarriage is a civil contract based on mutual consent on the part of a man and woman

Solemnization of marriage requires Ijab-o-kabul, that there should be a proposal made by or on behalf of one of the parties and an acceptance of the proposal by or on behalf of the other, in the presence of two male or one male and two female witnesses, as the case may be, who must be sane adult

Ijab-o-kabul should be without fear or undue influence or fraud

Marriage without a free consent of both the parties would not be legally valid

Consent obtained by coercion or undue influence from any of the parties would make the marriage invalid.

2019 CLCN 59 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Marriage

Requirements of a valid marriage.

2019 CLCN 59 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
MarriagePresumptionScope

Marriage can be presumed in the absence of any direct proof in prolonged and continual cohabitation as husband and wife. [Para. 15 of the judgment]

2016 SCMR 2170 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
MarriageDower, increase inScopeDower could be fixed before marriage and at the time of marriage or thereafter

Furthermore, dower once settled could always be increased subsequently by the husband or by an agreement between the parties

Property mentioned in nikahnama as dower could not be subjected to attachment or sale in execution.

2016 SCMR 2170 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
MarriageDower

Property mentioned in Nikahnama as dower could not be subjected to attachment or sale in execution proceedings.

2015 PLD 14 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
MarriageKhula'Restoration of property to husband in case of KhulaScopeDetermining factorsRule of restoration of property (given to wife) to husband in case of Khula' was not absolute

Where matter (of restoration of property) came before the court for settlement, court would determine the amount to be returned to the husband and such amount would be accepted by the husband

Disobedience of wife, her role in straining the relations, second marriage of husband and possible destitution of wife after divorce were determining factors for fixing amount of Khula'.

2015 YLR 1235 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
MarriageCondition mentioned in column No. 17 of Nikah NamaActionable claimJurisdiction of Civil CourtCondition on divorceScope

Wife earlier approached Family Court for her claim of dower as well as the inference of condition mentioned in column No. 17 of Nikah Nama

Dower was granted to the wife in the said family suit but for remaining claim she was directed to approach the Civil Court

Validity

Claim of wife made on the basis of condition mentioned in column No.17 of Nikah Nama was actionable claim under the contract

Said claim could be pressed into service through Civil Court

Wife could lawfully stipulate for her divorce under contract and she could also raise any claim based on the said contract apart from dower fixed at the time of contract of Nikah

Any such stipulation could not be termed as against public policy or against Islamic Law

Condition imposed upon right of Talaq could not be enforced through suit before Family Court and Civil Court had exclusive jurisdiction for the same

Revision was dismissed in circum-stances.

2004 PCRLJ 622 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Marriage

Marriage in Islam is in the nature of civil contract entered into between man and Woman and no formal deed, as per Sharia, is necessary to be drawn to prove that a valid marriage has come into being.

2001 CLC 1328 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
MarriageHusband, duties ofLiving in foreign country

Where a lady gets married and agrees to live with her husband in a foreign country in foreign environment, she forsakes a set social and cultural atmosphere to adjust in the new environment which requires a lot of efforts

Total support of the husband in that respect is necessary and he must help her in her adjustment

Husband has to be patient, gentle and understanding

Rashness and impatience generally lead to disputes which ultimately end up in the break-up of the marriage

Penalty for such a break has to be paid by the child.

1983 SCMR 688 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
And Caste Disabilities Removal Act (XXI of 1850)

Muhammadan Law-Marriage-Requirements of form and ceremony, legality and validity of marriage between a Sikh male and a Muslim female such Muslim female treated as a maid-servant, a keep or a mistress as distinguished from a wife-Sons of such woman neither receiving any allowance and privileges allowed to heirs of Sikh male nor acknowledged or recognized by him to be his sons-Held, such factual background disproved existence of a marriage, same having been kept secret, nor such relationship finds recognition in agricultural custom of Punjab-Marriage between such male and female cannot be inferred or presumed on basis of any enacted law, principle of law or presence of an acknowledgment and recognition by spouses concerned or by public generally.-[Muhammadan Law Custom (Punjab)].

1963 PLD 51 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Marriage Marriage- (Private International Law)-Validity of "form" of marriage to be judged by lex loci contractus-"Capacity" to enter into marriage bond to be determined according to law of domicile of party concerned-[Brook v. Brook (1861) 9 H L C 1921 and Halsbury's "Laws of England," Vol. 7, p. 91, para. 165, III Edition ref.].

1953 PLD 40 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent

Marriage Marriage-Parties-Jew and a non-Christian Chinese women Modified Chinese form-Valid-(Singapore case).

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Marriage", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14203

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Marriage"

PLD 2019
2019-January-16

P L D 2019 Supreme Court 280

Human Rights Case No.32642-P of 2018

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1969
Regular Second Appeal No. 691 of 1967, decided on 8th October 1968.

P L D 1969 Lahore 108

Mst. SARDAR BANO‑Appellant Versus SAIFULLAH KHAN‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1969
Regular Second Appeal No. 691 of 1967, decided on 8th October 1968.

P L D 1969 Lahore 448

Mst. SARDAR BANG‑Appellant Versus SAIFULLAH KHAN‑.Respondent

Court:
PLD 1953
[This case was referred to the above noted Division Bench, by Muhammad Jan, J. vide order dated the 4th December 1952].

P L D 1953 Lahore 112

(Mrs.) ZARINA TASSADAQ HUSSAIN‑Appellant Versus Qazi TASSADAQ HUSSAIN‑Respondent

Court: This case was referred to the above noted Division Bench, by Muhammad Jan, J. vide order dated the 4th December 1952.
PLD 1967
Criminal Appeal No. 74 of 1966, decided on 30th June 1967.

P L D 1967 Supreme Court 580

98, Lebury Road, London, W. II, United Kingdom — Appellant Versus (1) NURUDDIN K. JATOI, Muslim, Adult, Barrister at‑Law, etc. Muhammadi House, McLeod Road, Karachi AND

Court: (d) Muhammadan Law ‑ (Divorce) ‑ Marriage of Muslim Pakistani male solemnized in London with Christian woman under (English) Marriage Act, 1949, before a Registrar‑Such marriage cannot be dissolved by husband by unilateral pronouncement of talaq under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961), S. 7 Fundamental difference between a Muslim marriage and a Christian marriage‑Marriage under (English) Marriage Act, 1949 cannot be assimilated to a Muslim marriage‑Divorce Act (IV of 1869), Ss. 2 & 10‑Provisions of Divorce Act (1869) apply in terms to a marriage where one of the parties is a Christian‑Christian Marriage Act (XV of 1832), Ss. S & 42‑Prior subsisting marriage is a hindrance to marriage under Christian Marriage Act (XV of 1872) Christian marriage is monogamous‑Application of personal law to a marriage between Muslim and a Christian in Pakistan stands excluded‑Such marriage can be dissolved only under Divorce Act, 1869, i.e., by intervention of Court‑per Muhammad Yaqub Ali, J.'s (minority) judgment.
CLC 1988
Intra‑Court Appeal No. 4 of 1987, heard on 27th September, 1987.

1988 C L C 113

GHULAM QADIR‑‑Petitioner Versus THE JUDGE FAMILY COURT, MURREE and

Court: Lahore
PLD 1976
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 252/Q of 1975, heard on 17th November 1975.

1976L77

Before M. S. H. Qureshi, J Versus THE STATE AND ANo1Hl;x‑Respondents

Court: ‑.‑ S. 2(vii) ‑ Option of puberty‑Mere fact of woman's entering into subsequent marriage on attaining puberty‑Held, amounts to repu diation of earlier marriage‑Repudiation by woman of her marriage performed during her infancy‑Subject only to two conditions (i) marriage not consummated and (if) marriage repudiated on attaining age of 15 and before age of 18‑Muhammadan Law.
PLD 1969
Civil Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 771 of 1967, decided on 11th December 1967.

P L D 1969 Dacca 47

DR. A. L. M. ABDULLA‑Plaintiff Appellant Versus ROKEYA KHATOON AND ANOTHER‑Defendants Respondents

Court:
PCRLJ 2022
N/A

2022 P Cr

AMEER BAKHSH — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PCRLJ 2024
2022-September-20

2024 P Cr

Nasreen Bibi — Petitioner Versus Station House Officer and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore