Home Maxims & Terms Duties of excise meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Duties of excise

Duties of excise legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1993 SCMR 1342 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Excise and "duties of excise'

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Duties of excise", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14271

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Duties of excise"

SCMR 2003
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos.369 and 370‑P of 2001, decided on 26th September, 2002.

2003 S C M R 313

PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan Islamabad and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LTD., PESHAWAR and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1980
Constitutional Petition No. 910 of 1979, decided on 14th October, 1979.

P L D 1980 Karachi 205

GOLDEN PLASTICS LTD.-Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS,

Court:
PTD 2003
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos.369 and 370‑P of 2001, decided on 26th September, 2002.

2003 P T D 95

Islamabad and 3 others Versus Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LTD., PESHAWAR and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2003
Writ Petitions Nos. 1144 and 1526 of 1997, decided on 25th May, 2002.

2003 P T D 1002

Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED Versus C.B.R. and others

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLD 1964
5th December 1963

P L D 1964 Supreme Court 113

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS‑Appellant Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND

Court: High Court
SCMR 1993
Civil Appeals Nos. 101‑K to 107‑K, 137‑K, 138‑K and 149‑K of 1982 and 14‑K and 15‑K of 1984, decided on 7th October, 1991.

1993 S C M R 1342

HIRJINA & CO. ‑‑‑Appellants Versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1987
Constitutional Petition No.1308 of 1974, decided on 29th May, 1986.

1987 M L D 106

FAUJI FOUNDATION — Petitioner Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1980
Suit No. 157 of 1972, decided on 10th December 1979.

P L D 1980 Karachi 275

PAKISTAN INVESTMENT LTD.-Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS-Defendants

Court: Ss. 2(dd), 3, 4 & First Sched. as amended by Finance Ordinance (XI of 1970) read with Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Fifth Sched., Item 26 and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Third Sched., Item 43(b) Word "excise"-History, meaning, scope and signification-Levy of excise duty on intangible items, in contrast to tangible items-Not a new or unknown concept introduced by Finance Ordinance, 1970 Definition of term "excise duty" not given in Constitution (1962) No restriction can, therefore, be placed on legislative power of Federal Legislature-Held, term "excise duty" being susceptible to intangible items, it can also cover a levy on services rendered or provided-Amendments introduced in Act and its First Sched. By Finance Ordinance, 1970-Held, intra vires of powers of Central Legislature.-Words and phrases-Interpretation of statutes.
MLD 1986
Constitutional Petition No.1308 of 1974, decided on 29th May, 1986.

1986 M L D 1731

THE TREASURER OF CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS FOR PAKISTAN‑‑Petitioners Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 2 others Respondents

Court: Karachi
MLD 1989
Constitutional Petition No. D-350 of 1987, heard on 18th January, 1989

1989 M L D 1821

Messrs S.N.H. INDUSTRIES LTD. — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance,

Court: Karachi