Statutory powers, exercise of
Statutory powers, exercise of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Where express statutory power is conferred on a public functionary, it should not be pushed too far, for such conferment implies a restraint in operating that power, so as to exercise it justly `and reasonably
Excessive use of lawful power is itself unlawful.
Where express statutory power is conferred on a public functionary, it should not be pushed too far, for such conferment implies a restraint in operating that power, so as to exercise it justly and reasonably
Excessive use of lawful power is itself unlawful.
"Statutory powers, exercise of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14277
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Statutory powers, exercise of"
1992 P L C 873
RESEARCH, KARACHI Versus WAOARUDDIN
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh2025 S C M R 1929
ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, FAISALABAD through Collector of Customs — Petitioner Versus Messrs FATIMA ENTERPRISES, MULTAN and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2025 P T D 1012
WESTERN FREIGHT SHIPPING (PVT.) LTD. through Authorised Person and 4 others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division and 3 others
Court: Sindh High CourtP L D 2022 Sindh 552
ARY COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED through duly Authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus COUNCIL OF COMPLAINTS, ISLAMABAD through Secretary and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2012 P L C (C
PIYAR ALI GADIWAN Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 5 others
Court: Sindh High Court1993 P L C 673
INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. and another Versus CHAIRMAN, FOURTH WAGE BOARD AND IMPLEMENTATION
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1993S C M R 1533
and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus CHAIRMAN, FOURTH WAGE BOARD AND IMPLEMENTATION
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1976 Supreme Court 435
Sub. MUHAMMAD ASGHAR‑Appellant Versus Mst. SAFIA BEGUM AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ S. 10(3) and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98‑Allotment of horse/mule breeding grant‑Writ jurisdiction‑Collector, subject to control of Board of Revenue‑Vested with descretion to allot remount breeding tenancy‑High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Art. 98 ‑‑ Not justified in interfering with discharge of functions entrusted to Collector under law‑Court or tribunal, having jurisdic tion, determining a question‑Cannot be said to have acted illegally or with material irregularity merely for reason of having come to an erroneous decision on a question of fact or even of law‑Constitutional provision of Art. 98‑Not designed to empower High Court to inter fere with decision of Court or tribunal of inferior jurisdiction merely because of decision being wrong in its opinion.‑Writ.P L D 1979 Lahore 803
Ch. ABDUL RASHID-Petitioner Versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD
Court: -- Read with Capital Development Authority Ordinance (XXIII of 1960), Ss. 38 & 50-Rules standing by themselves and independently though statutory rules yet lose their independent character-Service matters-Kept outside purview of rule-making authority. - Civil services.2024 S C M R 1806
KHALID alias MUHAMMAD KHALID and others — Petitioners Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (ADJUDICATION), CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan