Dispute as to Immovable Property
Dispute as to Immovable Property legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Withdrawal of attachment was permissible when Magistrate was satisfied that there was no longer any likelihood of any breach of peace with regard to subject of dispute
Property would not continue to be under attachment of the Magisterial order till rights were decided finally by competent Court of law
Indian Criminal Procedure Code (II of 1974), Ss. 146 & 145.
"Dispute as to Immovable Property", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14290
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dispute as to Immovable Property"
1970 P Cr
THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus Mirza MOHIUDDIN AHMED AID OTHERS Respondents
Court: Karachi2000 Y L R 1420
MUHAMMAD IJAZ QURESHI. Petitioner Versus CHANGEZ KHAN, M.I.C. and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1949 P L D Lahore 397
Malik FATEH MUHAMMAD KHAN TIWANA‑Petitioner Versus THE CROWN and Mst. BHAG BHARI‑Respondent
Court: High Court2001 Y L R 1754
SHAHID ALI and another — Petitioners Versus Dr. EJAZ-UR-REHMAN and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1983 P Cr
AIJAZ HUSSAIN Applicant Versus QAISAR AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1968 P Cr
MOFIZUR RAHMAN CHOWDHURY‑1st Party Versus SERAJUL MOSTAFA AND OTHERS‑ 2nd Party
Court: Dacca1993 S C M R 2393
DHARAMPAL and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus Smt. RAMSHRI and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of IndiaP L D 1994 Karachi 384
S. IQBAL BALIGHUDDIN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SUB‑DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, CIVIL LINES, KARACHI and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents.
Court:1970 P Cr
MUHAMMAD AMIN‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD JAMIL‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1986 P C r
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and another Applicants Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Karachi