Home Maxims & Terms Town Planning Scheme meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Town Planning Scheme

Town Planning Scheme legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1991 SCMR 483 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 260(h)General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.21Town Planning SchemeBuilding operations in respect of specified category of open space were permanently prohibitedGovernment allowed relaxation on application of private persons permitting them to build the sameGovernment's order was challenged in Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court

Town Planning Scheme according to which building operations in respect of specified space were permanently prohibited had been approved under S.260, City of Lahore Corporation Act, 1941

Petitioners having obtained approval of the scheme under S.260, City of Lahore Corporation Act, 1941, could not now urge that same was not under the said section

Provision of S.260, City of Lahore Corporation Act, 1941 provided an elaborate procedure for initiating a scheme

Jurisdictional facts necessary for making reservation under the provisions of the Act had been enumerated with particularity

For relaxation of prohibitions contained in the Town Planning Scheme, procedure had not been followed either on the direction of the Government or independently by the Corporation

It was not shown that removal of prohibition contained in CI. (b), S. 260, City of Lahore Corporation Act, 1941, followed the disappearance of the ground or factor which necessitated the prohibition

In the absence of express power to that effect and in view of restrictions contained in General Clauses Act, 1897, it was incumbent upon the Corporation to adopt proper procedure and also to spell out satisfaction of jurisdictional requirement

That having not been done, order of Corporation whereby it had ordered relaxation of prohibited specified area allowing therein building of Housing Scheme suffered from legal defect not only in form but in substance as well.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Town Planning Scheme", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14313

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Town Planning Scheme"

CLC 1980
Writ Petition No. 4752 of 1979, decided on 12th April, 1980.

1980 C L C 2046

ZULQARNAIN MALIK-Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 1993
Civil Appeal No.1836 of 1977, decided on 21st July, 1992.

1993 P T D 188

ARVIND MILLS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 197 ITR 422
SCMR 1991
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos.423 of 1978 and 865 of 1979, decided on 5th June, 1990.

1991 S C M R 483

Dr. ABDUR RAUF and others — Petitioners Versus Sh. MUHAMMAD IQBAL and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1989
Constitution Petitions Nos. D-239 and D-112 of 1985, decided on 13th February, 1989.

1989 M L D 2480

PARADISE ASSOCIATES LTD. — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SIND and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
YLR 2001
Constitutional Petition No.D-1571 of 2000, decided on 22nd May, 2001.

2001 Y L R 1139

SHEHRI and others — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 1998
Wealth Tax Reference No.26 of 1983, decided on 6th December, 1996.

1998 P T D 2284

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus JAWAHARBHAI D. PATEL

Court: 225 I T R 582
PLD 1964
Criminal Revision No. 60 of 1963, decided on 2nd December 1963.

P L D 1964 Azad J & K 18

Syed MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN SHAH‑Petitioner Versus SARKAR‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1986
1986-June-18

P L D 1986 Supreme Court 673

Ch. MEHRAJ DIN AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus LAHORE IMPROVEMENT TRUST, LAHORE THROUGH THE

Court: High Court
PTD 1991
Income-tax Reference No. 194 of 1976, decided on 6th December, 1988.

1991 P T D 277

Z.M. MERCHANT Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: Bombay High Court (India)
CLC 1983
Regular Second Appeal No. 569 of 1979, decided on 6th February, 1983.

1983 C L C 3091

MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND OTHERS‑Appellant Versus MUZAFFAR IQBAL AND OTH ERS ‑Respondents

Court: Lahore