Home Maxims & Terms Teacher meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Teacher

Teacher legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2001 PLC 468 LABOUR-APPELLANT-TRIBUNAL-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesTeacher" and "teach", meaning and scope

Word "teacher" would mean "one who teaches or instructs; especially one whose business or occupation was to teach others"

Word "teach" would mean to impart knowledge by means of lessons, to give instructions in communicating knowledge, introducing into or impressing on the mind as truth or information and could be done as well through written communication, personal direction through the public press or through any means by which information could be disseminated.

1990 PLC 675 LABOUR-APPELLANT-TRIBUNAL-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases`Teach' and `Teacher'

Definition.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Teacher", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14394

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Teacher"

CLC 1988
Writ Petition No.4466 of 1987, decided on 12th January, 1988.

1988 C L C 510

Miss RIZWANA ILYA S‑‑Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, QUEEN MARY COLLEGE,

Court: Lahore
PLD 1998
1997-December-23

P L D 1998 Supreme Court 117

Raja MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and others — Petitioners Versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 1993
Appeal No. 30 of 1992, decided on 8th October, 1992.

1993 P L C (C

ABDUL KHALIQ Versus THE SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH,

Court: Service Tribunal Sindh
PLC(CS) 2011
Writ Petition No.26151 of 2010, decided on 24th December, 2010.

2011 P L C (C

GUL MUHAMMAD and others Versus SECRETARY EDUCATION and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2005
Appeal No.103 of 2003, decided on 7th July, 2003.

2005 P L C (C

SYED MUSA RAZA, S.S.T., Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Finance Department, Lahore and 2 others

Court: Punjab Service Tribunal
SCMR 1997
Civil Petitions Nos.298 to 307 of 1995, decided on 10th March, 1996.

1997 S C M R, 902

AHMED HUSSAIN and 8 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS, FEDERAL DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION,

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1982
Civil Appeals Nos. 2 to 15 of 1981

P L D 1982 Supreme Court 27

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB‑Petitioner Versus Saved BASHIR A14MAD BUKHARI‑Respondent

Court: ‑No. 118, paras. 13 & 7 read with Punjab Nationalised Schools (Men and Women Section) Teaching Posts Rules, 1974, r. 4 and Punjab Nationalised Colleges (Men and Women Section) Teaching Posts Rules, 1974, rr. 5 & 6‑Yires of Statutes and Rules‑Purpose of enacting Regulation 118 of 1972 as its contents read with Education Policy of Government and Speech of Education Minister: Not only to nationalise but also to rationalise take over of privately owned educational insti tutions to make it workable on permanent basis, to create a unified system of education and to merge separate classes of institutions (private ly owned and Government owned) and their respective staff into one integrated whole‑Government as such obliged to lay down principle and make rules relating to method of recruitment, qualifications, seniority, creation of cadres, determination of seniority and other matters tending to facilitate integration‑Rules of 1974 having been made to regulate recruitment of staff of nationalised educational institutions and laying down terms and conditions applicable to them, hence, held, within scope of para. 13 of Regulation and not ultra vires Fazal Elahl Ejaz and 22 others v. Government of the Punjab and 13 others P L D 1977 Lah. 549 overruled.
PLC(CS) 1998
Appeal No. 333 of 1995, decided on 30th July, 1996

1998 P L C (C

ABDUL AHAD and 3 others Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
SCMR 1986
Civil Appeal No. 448 of 1980, decided on 1st December, 1984.

1986 S C M R 975

RASHID AHMAD BHATTI and others — Appellants Versus THE SECRETARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and another — Respondents

Court: ---Art. 212(3)--Privately Managed Schools and Colleges (Taking Over) Regulation, 1972 M.L.R. 118, para. 7(2)--Leave to appeal granted to consider question as to what were rights of appellants under M.L.R. 118 and extent to which they had been given effect to in their adjustment after nationalization of institutions.
PLC(CS) 2006
Civil Petitions Nos.1032 and 1033 of 2003, decided on 8th November, 2005.

2006 P L C (C

INAYATULLAH and others Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan