Legislative immunity
Legislative immunity legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
When could be extended
"Legislative immunity", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14444
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Legislative immunity"
1992 S C M R 1496
SHAMIM-UR-RAHMAN — Petitioner Versus FAUJI FOUNDATION, RAWALPINDI
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1998 P T D 34
HUDABIYA ENGINEERING (PVT.) LIMITED Versus PAKISTAN
Court: Lahore High Court2019 S C M R 165
JACQUES CHAGNON, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF QU BEC — Appellant Versus SYNDICAT DE LA FONCTION PUBLIQUE ET PARAPUBLIQUE DU QU BEC — Respondent and HONOURABLE SERGE JOYAL, P.C., AND SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO — Interveners
Court: Supreme Court of Canada*P L D 1954 Dacca 51
KHAIRAT HOSSAIN, M. L. A. and another‑Security‑Prisoners‑Petitioners Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF EAST BENGAL‑Opposite‑Party
Court:P L D 2018 Supreme Court 686
Suo Motu Case No.2 of 2018 and Constitution Petition No.72 of 2011
Court: High CourtP L D 2002 Karachi 374
HAKIM ALI ZARDARI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus TEE STATE and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Although the immunity available under section 5 of the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992, is not available to the applicant in the present case, the contention that there is overriding provision in section 3 of the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992, is not available to the applicant in the present case, the contention that there is overriding provision in section 3 of the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992, looses its significance. It is provided in section 3 of the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992, that the provisions of said Act shall take effect notwithstanding anything contained in the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, the Customs Act, 1969, the Income tax Ordinance, 1979 or any other law for the time being in force. This overriding provision shall become operative if there is any conflict in the provisions contained in the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, and the provisions contained in the laws enumerated in section 3 or any other law for the time being in force. Nothing has been shown to us pointing out any conflict in the provisions contained in the Protection of Economic Reforms Act, 1992 and the provisions in the NAB Ordinance, 1999. p. 392 H2000SCMR814
IRSHAD AHMAD SHAIKH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2021 Islamabad 194
Syed YOUSAF RAZA GILANI — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad and 5 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtTHE ALL PAKISTAN LECAL DECISIONS
Before Mushtaq Hussain, C. J. and Zakiuddin Pal, J Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, RAWALPINDI AND
Court: .-- Arts. 248 & 47 read with Government of India Act, 1935, S. 306Immunity, duration of--Article 248, Constitution of Pakistan (1973) and S. 306, Government of India Act, 1935 being couched in present tense applicable only to persons actually holding office at tune of invocation of protection of such Article or section-Legislature being not ignorant of S. 306, Government of India Act, 1935, omission of words "against any person who has been" from Art. 248(1), held, clearly shows Constitution-maker's intention to limit protection only to period during which dignitary concerned served and such immunity vanishes once such person removed from office or ceased to hold office for any other reason.-Interpretation of statutes Immunity.P L D 1998 Lahore 90
HUDABIYA ENGINEERING (PVT.) LIMITED — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior, Government of Pakistan and 6 others — Respondents
Court: High Court