Grant
Grant legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Leave to appeal granted to consider contentions that civil Courts were not competent to entertain suit of respondent on account of bar contained in S.36 of Act (V of 1912) and since objection in this regard went to the very root of jurisdiction of civil Courts, High Court ought not to have declined to consider it, and that finding of Trial Court was based upon misreading of evidence.
S. 497/498-Bail-Grant or refusal of bail-Matter within discretion of Court concerned-Supreme Court does not interfere with exercise of such discretion, either way, unless discretion exercised not judicially or being perverse resulted in miscarriage of justice Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3).
Grant-A favour and not vested right-Grantee cannot set up his own conditions in respect of grant-Government not tied down to policies formulated earlier and can revise its policies-Grantee cannot claim transfer of proprietary rights in grant at price since revised by Government.
(b) Grant-State grant could be subjected to arty condition thought fit by State.
Grant Preamble & Ss. 3, 4 & 10 (2) [as added by Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) (Amendment) Ordinance (II of 1962)], Sched para. 9-Notification under S. 3 acquiring evacuee property to form compensation pool in terms of S. 4 for transfer in accordance with provisions of Schedule-Non-claimants have no "vested" right in property in their possession (Per Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ, Kaikaus, J. contra)-Claimants "vested" beneficiaries qua-compensation pool-Notification issued under S. 3 modified so as to exclude property, approval of sale of which had already been given by Central Government-Modified Notification has only prospective and not retrospective operation even if modification had been specifically declared to be retrospective in effect-Plea of non-claimant based on "vested" right for transfer of property rejected-Property excluded from compensation pool by subsequent Notification again becomes evacuee property (per Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fa
Grant Grant-Made under Landless and Ejected Tenants Scheme to tenant ejected by order bf Assistant Rehabilitation Officer Collector canceling grant holding that ejectment order was collusive between landlord and tenant - Cancellation, held unjustified-[P. L. D. 1960 S C 229 ref.]
Grant Grant-Cancellation of grant on -default of payment of installments-Notice not necessary-Cancellation automatically follows.
Lambardarl-Grants-Resumption-Memo. No. 1133-C dated 15-3-1948-Applicable only to Lambardars appointed after IS-3-1948-Lambardars, appointed before, but granted land after, IS-3-1948 not covered by Memo Chiragh Din v. The State P L D 1959 W. P. (Rev.) 178 ref.J
"Grant", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14481
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Grant"
1986 M L D 11
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SALEH — Respondent
Court: Board of Revenue Sind1992 C L C 1040
MUHAMMAD RAHIM and 6 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, SINDH and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1987 C L C 262
MUHAMMAD JAVED AKHTAR‑‑Petitioner Versus PUBLIC‑IN‑LARGE‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1994 C L C 2449
Lt.‑Col. (Retd.) M. ZAHOOR‑UL‑HAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus QUARTER MASTER GENERAL and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1987 Supreme Court 123
SHEIKHUPURA‑Appellant Versus ANJUMAN TALIM‑UL‑ISLAM AND OTHERS‑‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1964 (W
MESSRS SHAHMIR TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED Petitioner Versus MEMBER (COLONIES AND TRANSPORT) BOARD OF
Court:P L D 1965 Supreme Court 248
THE WEST PAKISTAN TRANSPORT COMPANY — Appellant Versus (1) THE TRANSPORT APPELLATE AUTHORITY (MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE),
Court: (a) Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939), S. 64 (a) & (f)‑Appeal against order of Transport Authority‑Plea that in case of refusal of permits on ground of preference of one applicant over another no appeal at all lies rejected‑Clause (f) does not control clause (a) S. 64 confers right of appeal on categories of persons mentioned but does not specify nature of relief persons aggrieved by Transport Authority's order may seek‑Any relief may be granted that is appropriate for doing full justice‑A person may be aggrieved by grant of permit to another‑Each clause of S.64 creates on independent right and is not controlled by any other clause‑Relief may be granted by cancellation of permits granted to another Ram Gopal v. Anant Prasad and another A I R 1959 S C 851 ref..2003 SCMR 576
LAL MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1985 S C M R 656
SIKANDAR ALI — Petitioner Versus KHUSHI MOHAMMAD and another — Respondents
Court: High Court1986 C L C 1836
MOULA BUX and others‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SIND through Secretary, Revenue Department,
Court: Karachi