Home Maxims & Terms Grant meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Grant

Grant legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1987 SCMR 489 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 185(3)Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912), S.36Leave to appeal, grant ofQuestions of jurisdiction and misreading of evidenceColonization of Government landsLambardari grantsSuit for declaration and permanent injunctionQuestion of jurisdiction of civil CourtsHigh Court declined to consider objection about competency of suit because it was not raised in Courts below

Leave to appeal granted to consider contentions that civil Courts were not competent to entertain suit of respondent on account of bar contained in S.36 of Act (V of 1912) and since objection in this regard went to the very root of jurisdiction of civil Courts, High Court ought not to have declined to consider it, and that finding of Trial Court was based upon misreading of evidence.

1981 SCMR 504 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 497/498-Bail-Grant or refusal of bail-Matter within discretion of Court concerned-Supreme Court does not interfere with exercise of such discretion, either way, unless discretion exercised not judicially or being perverse resulted in miscarriage of justice Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3).

1970 SCMR 364 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Grant-A favour and not vested right-Grantee cannot set up his own conditions in respect of grant-Government not tied down to policies formulated earlier and can revise its policies-Grantee cannot claim transfer of proprietary rights in grant at price since revised by Government.

1968 SCMR 642 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

(b) Grant-State grant could be subjected to arty condition thought fit by State.

1963 PLD 633 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Grant Preamble & Ss. 3, 4 & 10 (2) [as added by Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) (Amendment) Ordinance (II of 1962)], Sched para. 9-Notification under S. 3 acquiring evacuee property to form compensation pool in terms of S. 4 for transfer in accordance with provisions of Schedule-Non-claimants have no "vested" right in property in their possession (Per Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ, Kaikaus, J. contra)-Claimants "vested" beneficiaries qua-compensation pool-Notification issued under S. 3 modified so as to exclude property, approval of sale of which had already been given by Central Government-Modified Notification has only prospective and not retrospective operation even if modification had been specifically declared to be retrospective in effect-Plea of non-claimant based on "vested" right for transfer of property rejected-Property excluded from compensation pool by subsequent Notification again becomes evacuee property (per Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fa

1961 PLD 90 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Grant Grant-Made under Landless and Ejected Tenants Scheme to tenant ejected by order bf Assistant Rehabilitation Officer Collector canceling grant holding that ejectment order was collusive between landlord and tenant - Cancellation, held unjustified-[P. L. D. 1960 S C 229 ref.]

1961 PLD 83 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Grant Grant-Cancellation of grant on -default of payment of installments-Notice not necessary-Cancellation automatically follows.

1960 PLD 15 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Lambardarl-Grants-Resumption-Memo. No. 1133-C dated 15-3-1948-Applicable only to Lambardars appointed after IS-3-1948-Lambardars, appointed before, but granted land after, IS-3-1948 not covered by Memo Chiragh Din v. The State P L D 1959 W. P. (Rev.) 178 ref.J

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Grant", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14481

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Grant"

MLD 1986
Case No. S.R.O.A.-178 of 1984-85, decided on 2nd October, 1985.

1986 M L D 11

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SALEH — Respondent

Court: Board of Revenue Sind
CLC 1992
Constitutionaf Petition No. D‑882 of 1988, decided on 4th November, 1991. '

1992 C L C 1040

MUHAMMAD RAHIM and 6 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, SINDH and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1987
Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 154, 6, 63, 98, 150, 152, 158, 134 of 1986, 99,‑168, 209, 225, 231, 232, 304 and 313 of 1985 and 169, 250 of 1984, decided on 21st September, 1986.

1987 C L C 262

MUHAMMAD JAVED AKHTAR‑‑Petitioner Versus PUBLIC‑IN‑LARGE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 1994
Writ Petition No. 6524 of 1991, decided on 6th December, 1993.

1994 C L C 2449

Lt.‑Col. (Retd.) M. ZAHOOR‑UL‑HAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus QUARTER MASTER GENERAL and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1987
Civil Appeal No. 127 of 1984, decided on 12th October, 1986.

P L D 1987 Supreme Court 123

SHEIKHUPURA‑Appellant Versus ANJUMAN TALIM‑UL‑ISLAM AND OTHERS‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1964
Writ Petition No. 1485 of 1963, decided on 8th May 1964.

P L D 1964 (W

MESSRS SHAHMIR TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED Petitioner Versus MEMBER (COLONIES AND TRANSPORT) BOARD OF

Court:
PLD 1965
(2) KHURSHID & Co.,

P L D 1965 Supreme Court 248

THE WEST PAKISTAN TRANSPORT COMPANY — Appellant Versus (1) THE TRANSPORT APPELLATE AUTHORITY (MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE),

Court: (a) Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939), S. 64 (a) & (f)‑Appeal against order of Transport Authority‑Plea that in case of refusal of permits on ground of preference of one applicant over another no appeal at all lies rejected‑Clause (f) does not control clause (a) S. 64 confers right of appeal on categories of persons mentioned but does not specify nature of relief persons aggrieved by Transport Authority's order may seek‑Any relief may be granted that is appropriate for doing full justice‑A person may be aggrieved by grant of permit to another‑Each clause of S.64 creates on independent right and is not controlled by any other clause‑Relief may be granted by cancellation of permits granted to another Ram Gopal v. Anant Prasad and another A I R 1959 S C 851 ref..
SCMR 2003
Civil Appeal No.558 of 1998, decided on 16th October, 2002.

2003 SCMR 576

LAL MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1985
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 321 of 1977, decided on 4th December, 1984.

1985 S C M R 656

SIKANDAR ALI — Petitioner Versus KHUSHI MOHAMMAD and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1986
Constitutional Petition No. D‑53 of 1985, decided on 3rd March, 1986.

1986 C L C 1836

MOULA BUX and others‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF SIND through Secretary, Revenue Department,

Court: Karachi