Home Maxims & Terms Land Tenures meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Land Tenures

Land Tenures legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1968 SCMR 859 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

(b) Land Tenures - Aala Maliks and Adna Maliks Connotation. The land tenure of Aala Milkiyat as recognized in the former Punjab has a special connotation in the settlement literature. Before their abolition by the Martial Law Regulation No. 64 (West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation) Aala Maliks were the superior owners of the land with a right to receive privileged rent without any right to cultivation such as was possessed by Adna Maliks or those who were in actual cultivation possession of the land. Aala and Adna Milkiyat rights, sometimes, co-existed in the same person.

1964 PLD 756 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Registration of Claims (Displaced Persons) Act (111 of 1956), Ss. 2 & 5-Claim in respect of agricultural land Grant of land (Jagir) from State or Indian Ruler-Not property within meaning of S. 2 (2) - Claim respecting such land Not entertain-able under Sch. V of Form prescribed for filing of claim - Central Government Notification dated 7-4-58 and subsequent Notification dated 2-10-59-Directions by Claims Commissioner (vide letter No. Jagirs/59/13616 dated 10-9-59) that claims under Sch. V-A in respect of Jagir land with proprietary rights be transferred to Sch. V and verified as such-Held, not valid.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Land Tenures", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14488

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Land Tenures"

YLR 2001
N/A

2001 Y L R 2744

JAN MUHAMMAD alias JANA and 2 others — Petitioners Versus AMIR and 28 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2002
2001-October-1

P L D 2002 Lahore 48

GHULAM MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ELLAHI BUX‑‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1992
----Land---Dispute relating to ownership---Appellants claimed to be owners of land in question, which being Banjar and uneven on hilly area, was allegedly levelled and brought under cultivation by the forefathers of appellants and that they and their ancestors had been in possession as owners of the same for the last three hundred years---Dir, Swat and Chitral Land Disputes Enquiry Commission determined appellants to be the tenants of Ex-Ruler family of Chitral i.e. respondents who had stopped paying Qalang to respondents after abolition of State rule in Chitral ---Appellants' appeals were dismissed by the Authorities as also their revision---Appellants' Constitutional petition was dismissed by the High Court---Validity---Respondents had produced documents to show that they used to sell the land under cultivation of the appellants which fact established their title---Appellants on the other hand had not produced an iota of evidence to substantiate their claim of ownership---No record of rights was maintained in the State of Chitral where property in question is situate---In absence of record, matter had to be decided on the' evidence produced by the parties before the Enquiry Commission, which had made a detailed inquiry and appellants were heard by the Authority and the Tribunal---In absence of any other material on record, entire case had to be decided on the basis of the report of the Enquiry Commission---No error of law in the finding of any of the forums was pointed out---Appellants were thus, not proved to be the owners of land in question.

1992 S C M R 1099

ARULA and 4 others — Appellants Versus SHAHZADA GHULAM JILANI and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1994
Civil Appeal No. 490 of 1990, decided on 9th December, 1991.

1994 S C M R 402

and 8 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD DIN through Legal Heirs

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1986
Constitutional Petition No. D‑322 of 1977, heard on 7th May 1986.

1986 M L D 1264

Before Sajjad Ali Shah and Mamoon Kazi, RASOOL BUX and 12 others‑‑Petitioners Versus OFFICER ON SPECIAL DUTY, FEDERAL LAND, COMMISSION AND JOINT SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 2015
2014-January-9

2015 M L D 1778

GHULAM RASOOL and others — Petitioners Versus ASHIQ and others — Respondents

Court: Board of Revenue Punjab
PLD 1949
Privy Council Appeal No. 101 of 1946, decided on 15th December, 1949, from the Supreme Court of Fiji.

P L D 1949 Privy Council 274

ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE COLONY OF FIJI-Appellant Versus J. P. BAYLY LTD. — Respondent

Court:
CLC 1986
Writ Petition No. 457 of 1981, decided on 4th March, 1986.

1986 C L C 1429

TILLA MUHAMMAD and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF NORTH-WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE through Secretary, Law Department and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1957
Privy Council Appeal No. 30 of 1955, decided on 25th March 1957, from the Fiji Court of Appeal.

P L D 1957 Privy Council 219

RATU TAITO NALUKUYA‑Appellant Versus THE DIRECTOR OF LANDS and another‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1967
Writ Petition No. 666 of 1958, decided on 24th June 1966.

P L D 1967 Lahore 533

Nawabzada Malik HABIB ULLAR KHAN TIWANA AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER- Respondents

Court: