Home Maxims & Terms Requisition meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Requisition

Requisition legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1968 SCMR 897 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Requisition

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal on ground (i) that requisition for accommodation of public servant not always a public purpose and (ii) that requisitioning .authority did not apply mind to question of any alternative accommodation of Officer concerned-Held : both grounds not sustainable-Leave refused, by Supreme Court.

1965 PLD 437 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Sind (Requisition of Land) Act (XLVI of 1947)

Ss. 3 & 11-Requisition-Necessity for requisition to be compared with resultant dislocation of life and enjoyment of property-Absence of scheme envisaging entire need of Government-Defence of person hit by requisitioning order bound to 6e based on personal inconvenience and requirements.

1959 PLD 470 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Requisition -Owner aware of order of requisition- Owner's objection to mode of service of order only of technical nature

Not sufficient ground for issue of writ.

1956 PLD 178 SINDH-CHIEF-COURT Judicial Precedent

Requisition -Property in occupation of tenant-Tenancy not automatically terminated by requisition.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Requisition", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14489

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Requisition"

PLD 1966
Civil Appeal No. 13‑D of 1965, decided on 28th April 1966.

P L D 1966 Supreme Court 650

MESSRS R. SIM & Co. LTD.‑Appellant Versus (1) THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, TIPPERA,

Court:
PLD 1969
Civil Appeal No. 63‑D of 1968, decided on 3rd July 1969.

P L D 1969 Supreme Court 545

RADBA KANTA BANIK-‑Appellant Versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS — Respondents

Court:
PLD 1965
Writ Petitions Nos. 211, 236 to 240, 248, 249 and 257 of 1963, decided on 15th July 1964,

P L D 1965 Dacca 115

MUHAMMAD ABDUL MANAF AND OTHERS‑ Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS Respondents

Court:
PLD 1964
Writ Petition No. 154 of 1962, decided on 23rd November 1962.

P L D 1964 Dacca 24

MD. AMIR HOSSAIN‑PETITIONER Versus PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: (c) East Bengal (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act (XIII of 1948) as amended by East Bengal (Emergency) Requisi tion of Property (Amendment) Ordinance, 1960, S. 3 proviso‑ Word "proposal"‑Refers to proposal for starting requisition proceedings in respect of properties required by requiring body --Such proposal requires approval of provincial Government.
PLD 1963
Writ Petition No. 21 of 1961, decided on 22nd May 1961.

P L D 1963 Dacca 136

KUMUDINI WELFARE TRUST OF BENGAL‑ — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN

Court: (b) East Bengal (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act (XIII of 1948) Ss. 3 & 2 (i), as amended by East Bengal (Emergency) Requisition of Property Ordinance (III of 1960)‑Magistrate can not authorised another person to sign requisition order on his behalf.
PLD 1970
Petition No. 252 of 1967, decided on 11th July 1969.

P L D 1970 Dacca 680

Haji MD. KINU MUNSHI alias KINU SHEIKH‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KHULNA AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 1983
Writ Petition No. 150 of 1982, decided on 5th April, 1983.

1983 C L C 1026

ABDUL GHAFOOR‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. 46 of 1977, decided on 31st May 1977.

P L D 1978 Lahore 87

Before Aftab Hussain, 1 Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB AND 5 OTHERS-Respondents

Court: -- S. 3-Words and phrases --Word "requisition"-Meaning.-Words and phrases.
CLC 1989
Writ Petition No. 859 of 1989, heard on 1st July, 1989.

1989 CLC2160

Haji DUR MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MAILSI and 2 others Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1971
Petition No. 148 of 1968, decided on 4th March 1970.

P L D 1971

MINA SHAMSUR RAHMAN‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: