Home Maxims & Terms Accounts meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Accounts

Accounts legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2010 PTD 679 INCOME-TAX-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Fourth Sched., R.5(b)General' InsuranceAccountsSanctity of

Sanctity has to be granted to accounts prepared under the provisions of insurance law and an Assessing Officer did not have authority to upset the integrity of such accounts.

2002 PTD 407 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
AccountsAccountsMaintenance ofAdverse inference

Law does not cast any obligation on the assessee to maintain accounts and no adverse inference can be drawn for failing to maintain accounts

Where, however, accounts are maintained and the same are not produced or are suppressed, adverse inference can be drawn.

1973 PTD 429 KERALA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Accounts-Rejection-Returned yield very low-Profits of other items not shown in accounts-Whether proper reasons for rejecting accounts-Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950.

1972 PLD 8 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Accounts

Suit for—Plaintiff not entitled to value claim arbitrarily and could be directed by Court to make reasonable valuation on basis of his knowledge and information-Plaint seeking decree for Rs. 81,821.50 but valuing his claim for purpose of court fees at Rs. 200.00 only-Held, plaintiff should have valued suit for purpose of court fees at Rs. 81,821.50.

1971 PTD 369 MYSORE-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

-Accounts-Rejection-Estimate of income based on comparable cases-Duty to give notice and opportunity to rebut, to the assessee-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 13, proviso.

1971 PTD 257 MYSORE-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

-Accounts-Rejection of accounts-Estimate of income-Duty of Income-tax Officer to consider nature of accounts before rejection-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 13, proviso.

1969 PLD 175 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 7-Accounts-Suit for Court-fee-Plaintiff at liberty to value suit for purposes of court fee; at any figure lie chooses-for purpose of choosing forum of appeal arising out of such suit, appellant to follow value put by plaintiff himself-Suits Valuation Act (VII of 1887), S. 8.

1968 SCMR 1054 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Accounts-Mutual, open and current account-Mere fact that promissory note for amount due taken at one stage as additional security-Would not change nature and character of account.

1968 PTD 156 ALLAHABAD-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Accounts Accounts-Unexplained deposits by assessee-Whether assessable as undisclosed profits-Burden of proof-Failure of assessee to give satisfactory explanation-Duty of Income-tax Authorities to consider all the facts-Amounts added back to assessee's income as suppressed profits, and losses disallowed, must be taken into account to avoid double taxation.

1964 PLD 598 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Accounts -Plaintiff not filing any accounts of his ownNeither challenging accuracy of accounts filed by defendant

Accuracy of accounts disclosed by defendant, held, not in dispute.

1963 PLD 397 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Accounts -Suit for-Co-owner may sue other co-owners for rendition of accounts.

1961 PTD 755 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

"Production" of accounts at meetings of part­ners-Does not amount to "rendering" of accounts so as to defeat a suit for rendering accounts by a partner-[Firm of Kirparam Brij Lal v. Firm of Sukh Dev Bakhsh A I R 1922 Lah. 195 and Radhikaprasad Dani v. Nandkumar Laxman Prasad and others A I R 1944 Nag. 7 ref.].

1961 PLD 468 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Accounts Accounts-"Production" of accounts at meetings of part-ners-Does not amount to "rendering" of accounts so as to defeat a suit for rendering accounts by a partner-[Firm of Kirparam Brij

1954 PLD 43 JUDICIAL-COMMISSIONER-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent

Accounts Suit for-Preliminary decree-Question of possession of account books to be settled by Court-Commissioner for inspection and taking of accounts-Scope of authority limited.

1948 PLD 257 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent
Practice-Privy Council-Accounts

Board will determine question of princifle and not consider mere items. In matters relating to accounts the Board will determine any question of principle involved but will not consider mere items of account.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Accounts", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14493

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Accounts"

MLD 1988
Case No. 348 of 1984, decided on 31st May, 1988.,

1988 M L D 1792

THE STATE‑‑Prosecutor Versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI‑‑Accused

Court: Special Court (Offence in Banks) Lahore
CLD 2017
2016-March-3

2017 C L D 581

Syed MUSHAHID SHAH and 2 others — Appellants Versus COMMISSIONER (COMPANY LAW DIVISION), SECP and another — Respondents

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
CLD 2006
N/A

2006 C L D 356

NAUREEN AHSAN — Appellant Versus DIRECTOR (SECURITIES MARKET DIVISION) SEC and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
PLD 1976
R. S. A. No. 8 of 1972, decided on 1st July 1976.

P L D 1976 Quetta 99

Syed MAHBOOB ALI NAQVI-Defendant-Appellant Versus AUSTRALASIA BANK LTD., QUETTA-Plaintiff-Respondent

Court: S. 7-Banks, business of -Words "Open account!-- Meaning.-Words and phrases
PTD 2012
Income Tax Appeals Nos. 45 to 49 of 1998, decided on 9th December, 2011.

2012 P T D 1611

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES ZONE-I, LAHORE Versus AYESHA WOOLLEN MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, LAHORE

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 2020
2020-January-16

P L D 2020 Lahore 518

DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK PAKISTAN and others — Petitioners Versus Mst. SAIMA YASIN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLD 2020
2020-January-16

2020 C L D 518

DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK PAKISTAN and others — Petitioners Versus Mst. SAIMA YASIN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
CLC 1987
Suit No. 725 of 1979, decided on 13th June, 1987.

1987 C L C 2114

AFZAL KHAN and 6 others‑ ‑Plaintiffs Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED‑‑Defendant

Court: Karachi
PTD 1994
Civil Appeals Nos. 83-K and 84-K of 1989, decided on 20th December 1992.

1994 P T D 174

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANIES-III, KARACHI Versus KRUDD SONS LTD.

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1994
Civil Appeals Nos. 83‑K and 84‑K of 1989, decided on 20th December, 1992.

1994 S C M R 229

KARACHI‑‑‑Appellant Versus KRUDD SONS LTD: ‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan