Home Maxims & Terms Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII

Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1983 SCMR 146 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

? Permanent Transfer Deed issued?Settlement Department; held, becomes functus officio in matter.

1976 SCMR 119 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

..Sched. I read with Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme VIII-Settlement Commissioner's order not challenged and becoming final only right petitioner could assert was a right under Scheme VIII Question of cancellation of auction of property not being finally decided at such stage, petitioner not eligible for transfer of house under Scheme VIII either.

1976 SCMR 107 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Para. I-Transfer of rural house-Settlement authority finding house not in possession of any individual but occupied as patwar khana and directing transfer in favour of Revenue Department- -Contention that house could not be transferred to Tehsildar on behalf of Revenue Department, Tehsildar not being a person in occupation-Contention, held, could not help petitioner even if held valid since petitioner not found in possession-Settlement authority's finding, such authority being fully competent to do so, herd, rightly refused by [sigh Court to be interfered with.

1976 SCMR 8 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Definition of 'available' houses and shops in Scheme No. VIII-Manifests only such houses and shops being available for transfer to persons in possession as had not already been transferred under Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)-House standing transferred under Act at time of enforcement of Scheme No. VIII-Not available for transfer under Scheme No. VIII to a local allegedly in possession.

1972 SCMR 403 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII-Limitation-Condonation of delay

Statute, even if not prescribing any period for making applications for transfer, application' for transfer has, nevertheless, to be made within a reasonable time -Application for transfer of property made five years after notification inviting such applications-Such inordinate delay, held, should by itself have put Rehabilitation authorities on inquiry and determination of question t whether sufficient cause had been shown for condonation of such inordinate delay.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14526

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII"

SCMR 1972
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 186 \of 1972!, decided on 25th October 1972.

1972 S C M R 403

ABDUL RAHMAN‑Petitioner Versus KHUDA BAKHSH AND 2 Others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2002
N/A

2002 Y L R 1691

WAZIR AHMAD and 6 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1969
Civil Petition No. 175 of 1968, decided on 18th October 1968.

1969 S C M R 110

Raja GHULAM SARWAR KHAN‑Petitioner Versus CANTONMENT BOARD, MURREE AND 2 OTHERS Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1973
Settlement Revision No. 273 of 1970, decided on 1st December 1971.

P L D 1973 Lahore 215

ALLAH DITTA AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Raja SAEED AKHTAR‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1986
Civil Petitions for Special Leave to Appeals Nos. 4, 5 and 6-P of 1981, decided on 9th February, 1981.

1986 S C M R 771

Haji DHER WALI and others — Petitioners Versus Haji AHMAD DIN and others — Respondents

Court: ---Arts. 185(3) & 199--Settlement Scheme No. VIII--Locus standi of auction-bidder--Writ jurisdiction--View of High Court that a potential bidder at auction has no locus standi to invoke writ jurisdiction as he can neither compete with a person who has acquired a vested right nor can compel authority to bring properties to auction, upheld--Leave to appeal refused.--Locus standi.
SCMR 1976
Civil Appeal No. 46 of 1970, decided on 4th June 1975.

1976 S C M R 8

Khawaja MASOOD‑Appellant Versus AMEER BAKHSH AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1985
Constitutional Petition No. 241 of 1976, decided on 23rd January, 1985.

1985 C L C 2052

GHULAM HAIDER — Petitioner Versus THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SIND (GENERAL ), CENTRAL CELL and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1987
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 1131 of 1981, decided on 19th January, 1987.

1987 S C M R 691

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 1990
Writ Petition No.792‑R of 1977, decided on 26th March, 1990.

1990 C L C 1346

RAFIQUE ALAM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SIALKOT

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1994
Civil Petitions for Leave to Appeal Nos. 713‑L and 855‑L of 1992, decided on "18th December, 1993.

1994 S C M R 1635

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and 11 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER/DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR, R.P. CIRCLE No. II, LAHORE and 16 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan