Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII
Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
? Permanent Transfer Deed issued?Settlement Department; held, becomes functus officio in matter.
..Sched. I read with Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme VIII-Settlement Commissioner's order not challenged and becoming final only right petitioner could assert was a right under Scheme VIII Question of cancellation of auction of property not being finally decided at such stage, petitioner not eligible for transfer of house under Scheme VIII either.
Para. I-Transfer of rural house-Settlement authority finding house not in possession of any individual but occupied as patwar khana and directing transfer in favour of Revenue Department- -Contention that house could not be transferred to Tehsildar on behalf of Revenue Department, Tehsildar not being a person in occupation-Contention, held, could not help petitioner even if held valid since petitioner not found in possession-Settlement authority's finding, such authority being fully competent to do so, herd, rightly refused by [sigh Court to be interfered with.
Definition of 'available' houses and shops in Scheme No. VIII-Manifests only such houses and shops being available for transfer to persons in possession as had not already been transferred under Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958)-House standing transferred under Act at time of enforcement of Scheme No. VIII-Not available for transfer under Scheme No. VIII to a local allegedly in possession.
Statute, even if not prescribing any period for making applications for transfer, application' for transfer has, nevertheless, to be made within a reasonable time -Application for transfer of property made five years after notification inviting such applications-Such inordinate delay, held, should by itself have put Rehabilitation authorities on inquiry and determination of question t whether sufficient cause had been shown for condonation of such inordinate delay.
"Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14526
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. VIII"
1972 S C M R 403
ABDUL RAHMAN‑Petitioner Versus KHUDA BAKHSH AND 2 Others — Respondents
Court: High Court2002 Y L R 1691
WAZIR AHMAD and 6 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1969 S C M R 110
Raja GHULAM SARWAR KHAN‑Petitioner Versus CANTONMENT BOARD, MURREE AND 2 OTHERS Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1973 Lahore 215
ALLAH DITTA AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Raja SAEED AKHTAR‑Respondent
Court:1986 S C M R 771
Haji DHER WALI and others — Petitioners Versus Haji AHMAD DIN and others — Respondents
Court: ---Arts. 185(3) & 199--Settlement Scheme No. VIII--Locus standi of auction-bidder--Writ jurisdiction--View of High Court that a potential bidder at auction has no locus standi to invoke writ jurisdiction as he can neither compete with a person who has acquired a vested right nor can compel authority to bring properties to auction, upheld--Leave to appeal refused.--Locus standi.1976 S C M R 8
Khawaja MASOOD‑Appellant Versus AMEER BAKHSH AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High Court1985 C L C 2052
GHULAM HAIDER — Petitioner Versus THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SIND (GENERAL ), CENTRAL CELL and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Karachi1987 S C M R 691
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑‑Respondent
Court: High Court1990 C L C 1346
RAFIQUE ALAM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SIALKOT
Court: Lahore1994 S C M R 1635
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and 11 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER/DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR, R.P. CIRCLE No. II, LAHORE and 16 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan