Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Pearl meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Pearl

Pearl legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1997 CLC 1631 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Pearl"

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Pearl", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1456

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pearl"

CLC 1997
Writ Petitions Nos. 4254 and 4258 of 1997, heard on 30th April, 1997.

1997 C L C 1631

Haji TAJ DIN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR, FAISALABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Court: Lahore
YLR 2021
Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeals Nos. 66, 67 and 68 of 2002 and Confirmation Case No. 12 of 2002, decided on 2nd April, 2020.

2021 Y L R 1777

AHMED OMAR SHEIKH 3 others — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PLC 2007
Case No.4A (100) and 24(99) of 2003-K, decided on 14th July, 2005.

2007 PLC 119

PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL KARACHI WORKERS UNION through General Secretary Versus MESSRS PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL KARACHI through General Manager and 4 others

Court: National Industrial Relations Commission
PLC(CS) 2005
Civil Appeals Nos.107 and 108 of 2003, decided on 16th February, 2005.

2005 P L C (C

CHAIRMAN, PEARL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, RAWALAKOT and others Versus TARIQ INQALABI and others

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLC(CS) 1993
Revision Application No. KAR‑86 of 1993, decided on 10th May, 1993.

1993 P LC 771

PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL, KARACHI Versus WORKERS' UNION PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL and 2 others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
SCMR 2021
----Precedent---Rules/principles laid down in previous cases---Relevance---Each criminal case was to be decided having regard to its own peculiar facts and circumstances---Test to be essentially applied in one case may absolutely be irrelevant in another, as the crimes were seldom committed in identical situations---Criminal cases were to be decided on their peculiar facts and circumstance as such the rules laid down in earlier cases could not be applied in subsequent cases in an 'omnibus' manner.

2021 S C M R 873

The STATE through P.G. Sindhand others — Appellants/Petitioners Versus AHMED OMAR SHEIKH and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan Present: Mushir Alam,Sardar Tariq Masood and Yahya Afridi, JJ
YLR 2017
Writ Petition No.3372 of 2016, decided on 30th March, 2017.

2017 Y L R 1631

PEARL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RAWALAKOT AZAD KASHMIR — Petitioner Versus AJ&K GOVERNMENT, through Secretary Services and General Administration Department (General) and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
CLD 2008
2008-August-19

2008 C L D 1243

SAMREEN LIAQUAT MALIK — Plaintiff Versus Messrs AQMAR HEALTH FOODS through its Proprietors, Partners, Director, etc.

Court: Karachi
YLR 2004
Muhammad Kamal Khan v. Forest Department decided on 15‑1‑2002 distinguished.

2004 Y L R 1519

MUHAMMAD ATIF KHAN and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus ADMINISTRATOR BALDIA (SDM/AC), RAWALAKOT and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J&K
PLC 2007
Petition No.4A(12), 4A(13), 4A(14), 4A(15) and 4A(16) of 2005/K, decided on 13th September, 2005.

2007 PLC 270

MUHAMMAD ILYAS BABER and others Versus PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL KARACHI, through General Manager and others

Court: National Industrial Relations Commission

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library