Conviction for Murder
Conviction for Murder legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Evidence showing that incident resulting in murder was due to a dispute over small amount of three rupees and there had been exchange of abuses following upon refusal of petitioners to make payment
Leave granted to consider question of sentence only.
….S. 302-Conviction for murder No previous background of enmity between parties-Prosecution witnesses wholly independent-Eye-witness's account of murder consistent-Circumstances attending upon crime also corroborated No mitigating circumstance appearing-Special Leave to Appeal refused by Supreme Court.
S. 302-Conviction for murder-Special leave to appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider nature of offence in light of plea of private defence of property.
S. 302 -Conviction for murder-Special leave to appeal-Granted by Supreme Court to examine contention that witnesses were not reliable as they had 4,made shifting statements at different stages.
S. 302-Conviction for murder Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to consider whether act of accused c mounted to murder or an offence lesser than that.
S. 302-Conviction of murder Special Leave to Appeal granted by Federal Court to consider question whether proper weight had been attached by High Court to findings of trial Judge who enjoyed advantage of seeing and hearing witnesses.
S. 302-Conviction for murder Special Leave to Appeal granted by Federal Court to consider whether approver's testimony had been corroborated to extent and in manner necessary to establish case against convict.
S. 302-Conviction for murder Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to examine question whether there was credible evidence on record to support conclusion upon which conviction was founded by High Court.
S. 302-Conviction for murder-Sentence of death upheld by High Court-Special Leave to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to review whole evidence in case.
S. 302-Conviction for murder-Special Lease to Appeal granted by Supreme Court to re-examine evidence to see "if identification on the spot was difficult".
S. 302-Conviction for murder-Questions raised merely relating to appreciation of evidence on which conviction resting-Petition for Special Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court dismissed.
Conviction for murder-Compensation awarded to heir of deceased in addition to sentence imposed on accused-Part of punishment-Appellate Court, while disposing of appeal against conviction, competent to reduce amount of compensation without hearing heirs of deceased- Penal code (XLV of 1860)
S. 302.
"Conviction for Murder", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14573
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Conviction for Murder"
P L D 2019 Peshawar 211
ABDUL WAHAB and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Home Secretary Civil Secretariat and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2021 P Cr
GHULAM DASTAGIR alias DODO — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: BalochistanP L D 1958 Azad J & K 16
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN Versus AZAD J. & K. GOVT.
Court:1983 S C M R 753
MUHAMMAD AYUB AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: -- Art. 185(3) read with Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302-Murder Benefit of doubt--Contention that reasons which prevailed with courts below for extending benefit of doubt to one accused could in circumstances of case, be made available to other accused also nothing on record to reach a certain conclusion beyond any reasonable doubt as to which of two accused caused injuries to deceased-Held, case was fit one for grant of leave to appeal to re-examine evidence. Benefit of doubt.1987 S C M R 722
NOOR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAMIR and others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑‑Sentence‑‑Vindication of family honour‑‑Mitigating circumstance‑‑Conviction for murder and death sentence‑‑High Court's order altering sentence to imprisonment for life, challenged‑‑Plea that no reason was given by High Court for reduction of sentence, not sustained‑‑Accused‑respondents suspecting deceased having illicit relations with their mother admitted to have committed murder under grave and sudden provocation‑‑Case involving vindication of family honour of respondents, did not warrant extreme penalty‑‑Petition being devoid of merit, leave to appeal refused.‑ Sentence.1980 S C M R 892
IJAZ AHMED-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: --- S. 302-Evidence, appreciation of-Plea of insanity of accused found` rightly rejected by High Court-No member of accused's family produced to give evidence about accused's mental condition at time of incident-Medical evidence showing accused not in any way mentally disturbed at time of murder-Appellant failing to prove relapse of disease---Conviction maintained.-Insanity.1993SCMR1819
KAMAL KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1984 S C M R 411
MUHAMMAD ANWAR-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: High Court1968 P Cr
GHULAM ALI AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court