Home Maxims & Terms Provocation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Provocation

Provocation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 PLD 558 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 302ProvocationConceptProvocation in law means more than a provocation incidentAll provocations will not reduce the crime of murder to manslaughter

Provocation to have such result must be such as to temporarily deprive the person provoked of the power of self-control as a result of which he commits the unlawful act which causes death

While deciding such question regard must be had to the nature of the act by which elapsed offender causes death, to the time which elapsed between the provocation :rd the act which caused death, to the offender's conduct during that interval and to all other circumstances tending to show the state of his mind

1970 SCMR 520 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 302 read with S. 300-Murder trial-Provocation-Self defense-Sentence-Accused inflicting two knife blows on deceased's abdomen, resulting in his death-Accused and deceased found not only to have been grappling with and filthily abusing each other for a good time but injuries also found to have been inflicted all of a sudden-Case, clearly one of acting under provocation-Nothing indicating that deceased or his brother was armed with any weapon or had put accused in fear of death or grievous hurt-Plea of self-defense not available to accused in circumstances Sentence of death, however, held, not warranted-Sentence reduced to one of transportation for life.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Provocation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14586

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Provocation"

PCRLJ 1988
Criminal Appeal No. 681 and Murder Reference No. 174 of 1979, decided on 15th April, 1980.

1988 P

FAQEER MUHAMMAD‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1988
Criminal Appeal No.26-K of 1986, decided on 29th January, 1988.

1988 S C M R 615

VIUHAMMAD ASLAM — Appellant Versus Raja AZHAR MAHMOOD and another — Respondents

Court: ---S.300, Exception 1--Grave and sudden provocation--Calling someone "Chamcha" not sufficient to deprive him of his power of self-control- Word "Chamcha" which was commonly spoken to indicate loyalty of a person to his superiors, held, could not be regarded as of such a gravity as to deprive him of-his power of self-control.--Words and phrases.
PCRLJ 2004
2004-May-4

2004 P Cr

Naik MUHAMMAD YAQOOB — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 1993
N/A

1993 M L D 1391

MUHAMMAD RIAZ alias KALA — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1953
Privy Council Appeal No. 14 of 1952, decided on 19th November 1952, from Ceylon.

P L D 1953 Privy Council 9

THE ATTORNEY‑GENERAL OF CEYLON Appellant Versus KUMARASINGHEGE DON JOHN PERERA Respondent

Court:
PLD 1951
Criminal Appeal No. 8 of 1951, decided on 17th May, 1951, from the order of Sessions Judge, Montgomery, dated the 5th December 1950, convicting the appellants.

P

FATTA and another‑Convicts‑Appellants Versus CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1996
Criminal Appeal No.247 of 1993, decided on 28th‑January, 1996.

P L DJ996 Supreme Court 274

ALI MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus ALI MUHAMMAD and another ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑ S. 302 ‑‑‑ Plea of grave and sudden provocation ‑‑‑ Provocation in law‑‑ Elements. Grave and sudden provocation.
MLD 2019
2018-July-31

2019 M L D 746

NASEEBULLAH — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Balochistan
SCMR 1987
N/A

1987 S C M R 1979

MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Appellant Versus Raja AZHAR MAHM00D and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1986
2nd January 1986

1986 P Cr

KAMBIR‑‑Complainant/Applicant Versus ABBAS and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi