Home Maxims & Terms Dissolution of Muslim Marriages meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Dissolution of Muslim Marriages

Dissolution of Muslim Marriages legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 PLD 77 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 5 & Sched.Muslim Family. Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961), Ss.7(3) & 8Dissolution of marriageDelegation of right to divorce by husband to wifeExercise of said right

One of the conditions of the marriage between parties was that husband had delegated the right to divorce wife and entry to that effect was made in Column No.18 of Nikahnama

Wife in exercise of said right pronounced divorce upon herself for her husband and a notice was sent to Nazim Union Council concerned

Nazim had intimated wife that husband being not ready to pronounce divorce, wife could approach the Court as he could not grant Khula and Nazim sent the case to the Family Court

Nazim was oblivious of legal position as right of divorce could be lawfully delegated by husband to wife and that had happened in the present case and notice was sent by wife in compliance with the terms of Ss.7 & 8 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961

Ninety days prescribed period having expired after receipt of notice issued by wife and re-conciliation being not possible between the parties, law as prescribed in Ss.7(3) & 8 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 would have its course

Nazim would issue requisite document regarding receipt of notice and failure of reconciliation within prescribed time.

1987 SCMR 518 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss 7(1), (3) & 8Dissolution of marriage

Husband pronouncing Talaq but abstaining from giving a notice to Chairman, should be deemed to have revoked the pronouncement

Provisions of subsection (3) of S.7 of the Ordinance precludes a Talaq from being effective, for a certain period and within that period, consequently, it could not be said that marital status of the parties had in any way been changed

Parties still in law continue to be husband and wife

Dissolution, in Khula' and Mubara't, proceed, on the wishes of one party culminating in a settlement between the parties and as such the statute takes over even where parties have by a settlement arrived at dissolution

Requirements of provisions of S. 7, in such case, have to be observed.

1969 SCMR 118 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 5 read with Sched.-Dissolution of Muslim marriage-Family Court dissolving marriage holding that the wife had developed intense dislike for her husband and in such circumstances she would "certainly be transgressing the limits of God" if forced to live with him

Order passed by Court, held, proper.

1952 PLD 227 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Dissolution of Muslim MarriagesSuit for, by Muhammadan wife on ground of husband's failure to maintainForum of suitJurisdiction of Court at place of residence of wife-Requisites

Wife to establish she was entitled to live apart and be maintained where she resided-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 20 (c)-Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act (VIII of 1939) S. 2 (ii).

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Dissolution of Muslim Marriages", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14589

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dissolution of Muslim Marriages"

PLD 1955
Civil Appeal No. 31 of 1953 decided on 30th May, 1955 against the order of District Judge, Mirpur datod 22nd September, 1953.

P L D 1955 Azad J

FAZAL ELLAHI‑Appellant Versus Mst. ALAM BI‑Respondent

Court:
YLR 2004
Writ Petition No.1313 of 2003, decided on 20th January, 2004.

2004 Y L R 2387

Mst ASMA BIBI — Petitioner Versus MURAD ALI and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 1989
Intra‑Court Appeal No. 58 of 1987 in Writ Petition No. 4440 of 1986, decided on 19th December, 1988.

1989 C L C 466

NOOR AHMAD‑‑Appellant Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1956
Regular Second Appeal No. 247 of 1951, decided on 5th January, 1953 from the decree of District Judge, Shahpur at Sargodha, dated the 8th May 1951, reversing that of S. M. Ishfaq ‑Ali, Civil judge. 1st Class, Sargodha, dated the 24th November 1950.

P L D

Mst. DAULAN‑(Plaintiff) ‑Appellant Versus DOSA‑(Defendant)‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 1995
Writ petition No. 94 of 1994, decided on 7th December, 1994.

1995 C L C 731

Maulvi MIR QALAM KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SHAMIM BIBI and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 2020
2020-February-27

2020 C L C 1874

Mst. FARHAT IMAM — Petitioner Versus SAJID NAZEEF and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Bannu Bench)
CLC 1990
Writ Petition No.40 of 1989, decided on 24th September, 1989.

1990 C L C 30

RAFIQ HUSSAIN SHAH‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. IMTIAZ BIBI and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Peshawar
CLC 1984
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 5/Mzd. of 1984, decided on 9th April, 1984.

1984 C L C 1465

MUHAMMAD YUSUF alias YUNUS‑Petitioner Versus Mst. KAISAR JAN‑Respondent

Court: S C (A J & K)
MLD 2014
2013-June-4

2014 M L D 988

ARSHAD HABIB — Petitioner Versus Mst. GHAZALA AKBAR and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
MLD 2025
2024-May-20

2025 M L D 479

YASIR MANZOOR AMIN — Petitioner Versus Dr. MEHREEN IQBAL and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar