Home Maxims & Terms Misjoinder of Charges meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Misjoinder of Charges

Misjoinder of Charges legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2009 PCrLJ 1245 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 233Separate charges for distinct offencesMisjoinder of chargesEffect

Misjoinder of charges is an illegality which vitiates the entire proceedings.

2009 PCrLJ 1245 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 233 & 537Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.420Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199Constitutional petitionMisjoinder of chargesValidity

Two separate accused, according to F.I.R., had committed separately cognizable offences, yet only one F.I.R. had been registered by the S.H.O.

Accused and one other person had cheated the complainant separately, but the offences committed by them under S.420, P.P.C. were merged into one F.I.R.

Mandatory provisions of S.233, Cr.P.C. had been disregarded and violated both by police authorities and by Trial Court at the time of framing of charge and in subsequent proceedings

Case was of misjoinder of charges, which in view of mandatory provisions of S.233, Cr.P.C. was an illegality vitiating the entire proceedings and was not curable under S.537, Cr.P.C.

Such illegality being patent on the face of record and the proceedings before Trial Court continuously suffering from the same, were set aside being unlawful

Prosecution was directed to submit fresh separate challans against both the accused persons to be charged separately by the Trial Court

Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.

2001 PTD 286 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
AssessmentAuditWritWrit petition against order under S.142(2A)

Order staying assessment proceedings and observing that payment of auditor's fees would be considered at final hearing of writ petition

Order was valid

Indian Income Tax Act, 1961', S. 142

Constitution of India, Art. 226:

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Misjoinder of Charges", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14642

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Misjoinder of Charges"

PLD 1964
Criminal Revisions Nos. 90, 91 and 92 of 1964, decided on 20th March 1964.

P L D 1964 (W

THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus MIRZA AZAM BEG, P. C. S. AND ANOTHER — Respondents

Court:
PCRLJ 1977
Criminal Appeals Nos. 346 and 352 of 1968, decided on 24th January 1972.

1977 P Cr

ISHTIAQ ALI‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1985
Criminal Revision No. 15 of 1985, heard on 28th January, 1985.

_P L D 1985 Lahore 173

MUHAMMAD SHAFI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1970
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 2-P of 1970, decided on 24th March 1970.

1970 S C M R 768

SAID AKBAR-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1981
Criminal Revision No. 186 of 1973, decided on 21stOctober, 1979.

1981 P Cr

Malik NOOR MUHAMMAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1960
Full Bench Reference No. 2 of 1959, in Writ Petition No. 49 of 1959, decided on 3rd March 1960.

P L D 1960 Dacca 551

ABDUS KUDDUS AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus (1) MR. M. S. KHAN, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, TAKGAIL,

Court:
PCRLJ 2009
2009-May-12

2009 P Cr

MUGHEES AZAM BHATTI — Petitioner Versus Ch. JAVED IQBAL SAIF, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1960
Criminal Appeal No. 404 of 1959, decided on 30th November 1959.

P L D 1960 (W

ALI NAWAZ‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1958
Appeal No. 501 of 1956, decided on 19th August 1957.

P L D 1958 Dacca 253

ABDUL HAKIM‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court:
MLD 1996
Criminal Appeal No.676 of 1988 and Criminal Revision No.29 of 1989, heard on 14th May, 1996.

1996 M L D 1639

ABDUL RASHID ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore