Misjoinder of Charges
Misjoinder of Charges legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Misjoinder of charges is an illegality which vitiates the entire proceedings.
Two separate accused, according to F.I.R., had committed separately cognizable offences, yet only one F.I.R. had been registered by the S.H.O.
Accused and one other person had cheated the complainant separately, but the offences committed by them under S.420, P.P.C. were merged into one F.I.R.
Mandatory provisions of S.233, Cr.P.C. had been disregarded and violated both by police authorities and by Trial Court at the time of framing of charge and in subsequent proceedings
Case was of misjoinder of charges, which in view of mandatory provisions of S.233, Cr.P.C. was an illegality vitiating the entire proceedings and was not curable under S.537, Cr.P.C.
Such illegality being patent on the face of record and the proceedings before Trial Court continuously suffering from the same, were set aside being unlawful
Prosecution was directed to submit fresh separate challans against both the accused persons to be charged separately by the Trial Court
Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.
Order staying assessment proceedings and observing that payment of auditor's fees would be considered at final hearing of writ petition
Order was valid
Indian Income Tax Act, 1961', S. 142
Constitution of India, Art. 226:
"Misjoinder of Charges", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14642
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Misjoinder of Charges"
P L D 1964 (W
THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus MIRZA AZAM BEG, P. C. S. AND ANOTHER — Respondents
Court:1977 P Cr
ISHTIAQ ALI‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: Karachi_P L D 1985 Lahore 173
MUHAMMAD SHAFI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court:1970 S C M R 768
SAID AKBAR-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: High Court1981 P Cr
Malik NOOR MUHAMMAD — Applicant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1960 Dacca 551
ABDUS KUDDUS AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus (1) MR. M. S. KHAN, SPECIAL MAGISTRATE, TAKGAIL,
Court:2009 P Cr
MUGHEES AZAM BHATTI — Petitioner Versus Ch. JAVED IQBAL SAIF, ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1960 (W
ALI NAWAZ‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1958 Dacca 253
ABDUL HAKIM‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:1996 M L D 1639
ABDUL RASHID ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore