Land Reforms Manual
Land Reforms Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Federation and Provinces are at liberty to make necessary remedial legislation for the purpose of land reforms by removing the defects, which were pointed out by Supreme Court in its various judgments.
(C. M. L. A's. Regulation No. 64), para. 27 read with para. 16-(Excess land vesting to Government "free from any encumbrance or charge")-Mortgagee and mortgagor both declarants and 'surrendering land, mortgagor retaining a certain area-Mortgagee only entitled to get back his mortgage money out of compensation-Civil Court has no jurisdiction to make any order as regards land vested in Government-Mortgagee having surrendered his rights in entire land (in this case) had no choice to proceed against land retained by mortgagor-Existence and extent of encumbrance to be determined by Martial Law Authority under para. 16-(Mortgagee whose name was removed from Revenue records as result. of redemption in course of pending, civil litigation between mortgagor and mortgagee, may be deemed to be "existing owner"-[N.W. F. P. Restitution of Mortgaged Lands Act (XXXII of 1950), S.4]-[Land Reforms Manual, Vol. I, p. 360 (Decisions of Land Commission, cls. (i), (ii), (iii))].
"Land Reforms Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14672
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Land Reforms Manual"
1984 C L C 2098
TAYAB AND 4 OTHERS Petitioners Versus THE OFFICER ON SPECIAL DUTY, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION AND 3 OTHERS Respondents
Court: Karachi1984 C L C 854
Ch. ABDUL AZIZ AND 3 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE OFFICER ON SPECIAL DUTY, FEDERAL LAND
Court: Karachi1968 SCMR 262
NAWAB MUHAMMAD FARED KHAN-Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES-Respondents
Court: Martial Law Regulation C. M. L. A's. No. 64 paras. 3 & 27 read with Land Reforms Manual, Vol. 1, para. 50-Deputy Land Commissioner although aware ofsuit concerning proprietorship of land upholding entries in revenue records but at same time observing in his order "it is outside my jurisdiction to investigate the dispute over the ownership of the forest land in question"-Order of resumption passed by him, held provisional despite fact that he failed to state so specifically in his order-Civil suit brought to call in question correctness of entry in Revenue records, in such circum stance, held, not rendered inco mpetent-Mere fact that under para. 3 of Regulation the Land Reforms Authorities could ignore decree passed by Civil Court-Does not rule out the equal power of authorities to accept decisions of civil Courts.P L D 1966 Supreme Court 340
K. B. Mian FEROZE SHAH‑Appellant Versus Nawabzada MUHAMMAD UMAR KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959 (C. M. L. A's. Regulation No. 64), para. 27 read with para. 16‑(Excess land vesting to Government "free from any encumbrance or charge")‑Mortgagee and mortgagor both declarants and 'surrendering land, mortgagor retaining a certain area‑Mortgagee only entitled to get back his mortgage money out of compensa tion‑Civil Court has no jurisdiction to make any order as regards land vested in Government‑Mortgagee having surrendered his rights in entire land (in this case) had no choice to proceed against land retained by mortgagor‑Existence and extent of encumbrance to be determined by Martial Law Authority under para. 16‑(Mortgagee whose name was removed from Revenue records as result. of redemption in course of pending, civil litigation between mortgagor and mortgagee, may be deemed to be "existing owner"‑N.W. F. P. Restitution of Mortgaged Lands Act (XXXII of 1950), S.4‑Land Reforms Manual, Vol. I, p. 360 (Decisions of Land Commission, cls. (i), (ii), (iii)).2014 S C M R 164
Haji MUHAMMAD ZAMAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1998 S C M R 36
Fisheries & Wildlife, Peshawar and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1986 M L D 786
RAFIQUE MUHAMMAD KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERAL LAND COMMISSIONER and others‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1981 Karachi 114
Court: (b) Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 M. L. R. 115‑
P L D 1980 Karachi 427
MAHFOOZUR REHMAN BABAR AND 10 OTHERS — Petitioners Versus FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents
Court:1996 P L C (C
AKHTAR HUSSAIN Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER/COLLECTOR, SUB-DIVISION, KASUR and 9 others
Court: Lahore High Court