Question of Divisibility
Question of Divisibility legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
House-Question of divisibility Decision rests exclusively within jurisdiction of Settlement Authorities-High Court, held rightly declined to interfere with its writ jurisdiction.
Ss. 2 (12) & 2 (4) and Sch., Parts I & II- Houses and shops-Question of divisibility-Exclusive jurisdiction of Settlement authorities-Not arnenalle to writ jurisdiction of High Court unless impugned order sufferea from lack or excess of jurisdiction-Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98.
"Question of Divisibility", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14698
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Question of Divisibility"
1983 S C M R 1289
Mst. NAZIRAN BEGUM AND OTHERS — Appellants Versus GHULAM NABI AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1991 Supreme Court 617
Mst. SHAHZADA BEGUM ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus AHMAD KAMAL and 18 others ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court:1970 S C M R 48
NAWAB KHAN-Petitioner Versus Mst. HAJRA BEGUM AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High Court1970 S C M R 330
ABDUL RASHID AND 3 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD NAZIR-Respondent
Court: High Court1969 S C M R 963
QAMAR DIN‑Petitioner Versus MAULA BAKHSH AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: High Court1984 S C M R 1316
Ch. ABDUL AZIZ — Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1989SCMR1014
UMAR DIN and others‑‑Petitioners Versus ALI MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court1973 S C M R 192
ABDUL HAQUE AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High Court2007 S C M R 1781
KHURSHID and others — Appellants Versus UMAR BAKHSH through L.Rs. — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1973 Supreme Court 124
Agha SHAUKAT ALI‑Appellant Versus THE SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: