Home Maxims & Terms Division of House meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Division of House

Division of House legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1969 SCMR 964 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Sched., Part I-Division of house Law gives full power to Settlement Authority to decide as to manner in which house should be divided-Question whether shop should be included in house-A question of mode of division

High Court, in writ jurisdiction, held, rightly refused to interfere with order of Settlement Authority.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Division of House", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14699

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Division of House"

SCMR 1983
Civil Appeal No. 270 of 1976, decided on 24th April, 1983.

1983 S C M R 1289

Mst. NAZIRAN BEGUM AND OTHERS — Appellants Versus GHULAM NABI AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1981
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1221 of 1966, decided on 28th October, 1980.

1981 C L C 1480

ABDUR RASHID (REPRESENTED BY HIS HEIRS)‑ — Appellant Versus S. MASUDUL HASSAN, ETC.‑Defendants

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1983
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1363 of 1980, decided on 22nd June, 1982.

1983 S C M R 60

KHUDA BAKHSH-Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD YAQUB AND Others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1970
Letters Patent Appeal No. 274 of 1966, decided on 22nd October 1969.

P L D 1970 Lahore 766

KARAM DIN‑ — Appellant Versus THE SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE AND 4 OTHERS‑ — Respondents

Court: Art. 98 read with Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S. 2(4), First Proviso and (12) & Sch.. Part I ---Division of house‑--Decision of Settlement Authorities as to divisibility of house‑Cannot be interfered with in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Art. 98‑--Jalil Ahmad v. Settlement Commis sioner P L D 1962 Kar. 197 dissented from.
SCMR 1975
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 387 of 1974, decided on 13th December 1974.

1975 S C M R 381

Mst. FATIMA AND OTHERS'-Petitioners Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LYALLPUR AND

Court: High Court
SCMR 1970
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 8 of 1970, decided on 2nd February 1970.

1970 S C M R 590

ANWARUL HAQ alias IBRAT ANWAR‑Petitioner Versus E. W. RANDLE AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1977
Civil Appeal No. 32 of 1970, decided on 8th April 1977.

1977 S C M R 345

IMAM DIN‑Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

Court: High Court
SCMR 1970
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 270 of 1969, decided on 28th January 1970.

1970 S C M R 330

ABDUL RASHID AND 3 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD NAZIR-Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1969
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 351 of 1967, decided on 12th October 1967.

1969 S C M R 963

QAMAR DIN‑Petitioner Versus MAULA BAKHSH AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1969
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 286 of 1967, decided on 12th October 1967.

1969 S C M R 964

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus SETTLEMENT AUTHORITIES AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: High Court