Home Maxims & Terms Appointment meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Appointment

Appointment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1987 SCMR 407 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words "officiation" and "appointment"

Connotation of.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Appointment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14778

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appointment"

PLD 2023
2022-August-30

P L D 2023 Islamabad 105

BETTER ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS (PVT.) LTD. through authorized Representative/Director — Appellant Versus BALOCHISTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, QUETTA through Chairman and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1968
Civil Revision Application No. 129 of 1965, decided on 12th June 1968.

P L D 1968 Karachi 916

PRESSING FACTORY‑‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS ELITE TEXTILE MILLS AND PRESSING

Court:
PLC(CS) 1987
Appeal No. 33 of 1985, decided on 4th June, 1987.

1987 P L C (C

SHAFI MUHAMMAD Versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SIND and 6 others

Court: Service Tribunal Sind
SCMR 1976
Civil Review Petition No. 12‑R of 1975, decided on 11th June'19750:

1976 S C M R 48

PROF. ABDUL QAYYUM QURESHI-Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB‑Respondent

Court: S. 14 ‑ Petitioner, a University Registrar offered "officiating" appointment of Chairman, Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, joining appointment without insisting on settlement of terms and conditions of service, or objecting to use of word "officiating" in notification of his appointment‑‑Subsequent notification, specifying terms and conditions of petitioner's service Contention that petitioner having been appointed only to officiate as Chairman of Board and no terms and conditions being prescribed in original notification, regular appointment commenced from date of subsequent notification‑‑‑Held : Petitioner's initial appointment not in nature of normal promotion in his own institution but fresh appointment to a new post in different institution‑Use of word "officiating" Not affecting true nature of appointment‑‑Petitioner's appointment governed by S. 14 contemplating either regular appointment for 4 years or ad hoc appointment not exceeding a year‑Subsequent notification being merely supplementary did not constitute fresh appointment‑‑Petitioner having enjoyed full statutory term of 4 years rightly held to be no longer entitled to continue in office. Civil Services‑Words and phrases.
PLC(CS) 1971
Case No. 647/315 of 1970, decided on 16th June 1971.

1971 P L C 186 [C

Ashfaq All Khan, Members AHSAN‑UL‑HAQ SULEMANI Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB,

Court: 1971 P L C 186 C.S.T.
PLC(CS) 1971
Case No. 223/77 of 1970, decided on 23rd December 1976.

1971 P L C 79 [C

AND ANOTHER Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF WEST

Court: 1971 P L C 79 C.S.T.
PLC(CS) 2015
Civil Petition No.769-K of 2011, decided on 13th February, 2015.

2015 P L C (C

Dr. AZIM-UR-RAHIM KHAN MEO Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 9 others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2015
Civil Petition No.769-K of 2011, decided on 13th February, 2015.

2015 S C M R 723

Dr. AZIM-UR-RAHIM KHAN MEO — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 9 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1983
Suit No. 3 of 1975, decided on 6th March, 1983.

1983 C L C 3273

MESSRS WASEEM CONSTRUCTION Co.‑Plaintiff Versus PROVINCE OF SIND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, SIND

Court: Karachi
PLC(CS) 1988
Appeal No.35 of 1986, decided on 22nd June, 1987.

988 P L C (C

JAN MUHAMMAD S. BHUTTO Versus The DIRECTOR, SCHOOL EDUCATION, HYDERABAD and 64 others

Court: Service Tribunal Sind