Colonization of Government Lands
Colonization of Government Lands legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Leave to appeal granted to consider contentions that civil Courts were not competent to entertain suit of respondent on account of bar contained in S.36 of Act (V of 1912) and since objection in this regard went to the very root of jurisdiction of civil Courts, High Court ought not to have declined to consider it, and that finding of Trial Court was based upon misreading of evidence.
"Colonization of Government Lands", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14785
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Colonization of Government Lands"
2005 S C M R 268
BASHIR AHMED and 5 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1981 C L C 26
ABDUL HAMID‑Petitioner Versus THE COLLECTOR, FAISALABAD AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1994 C L C 1162
GHULAM MUHAMMAD and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ALLAH WASAYA through Legal Heirs and others‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Labore1988 C L C 2234
MUHAMMAD JAMIL‑‑Appellant Versus Ch. ABDUL KARIM‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1959 (W
ALLAH DITTA‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE‑‑Respondent
Court:1982 S C M R 1183
MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM AND 2 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Respondents
Court: ‑S. 3‑Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act (V of 1912)‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑Writ petition Intra‑Court appeal‑Order passed under Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912 being appealable, revisable, and reviewable under such Act, Intra‑Court Appeal, held, barred in view of provisions of S. 3 of Land Reforms Ordinance, 1972.‑Intra‑Court Appeal.P L D 1960 (W
AHMAD KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court:2006 C L C 1253
GHULAM MURTAZA through L.Rs. — Petitioners Versus FALAK SHER — Respondent
Court: Lahore1997 C L C 1735
KAM,~L through Legal Heits‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2002 Y L R 2414
FATEH MUHAMMAD and 24 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), BHAKKAR and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Board of Revenue Punjab