Bigamy
Bigamy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Respondent filing -complaint against them under S. 494/109, P.P.C. to which defence of appellants was that respondent had divorced her on 25-11-1974 and both appellants in good faith believed that the marriage had come to an end
Trial Court and Appellate Court finding that divorce deed having not been executed in accordance with S. 7, Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 it was a nullity in eye of law and that it had lost its value by resumption of married life by the spouses
"Bigamy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14787
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Bigamy"
1989 C L C 1062
ZAKIR HUSSAIN SIDDIQUI‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. NASIM BANO and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1986 P Cr
INAYAT KHAN Petitioner Versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SIALKOT and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2018 Y L R 2548
Ms. FARAH TAJ — Petitioner Versus The SECRETARY, LOCAL BODIES and others — Respondents
Court: Sindh1969 P Cr
Mst. GHULAM ZOHRA‑Applicant Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1967 Supreme Court 334
MRS. C. M. SAMUEL‑Appellant Versus (1) MR. C. SAMUEL AND
Court:1992 M L D 93
NASEEM AKHTAR DURRANI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ABIDA SULTAN and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1976 P Cr
YAQOOB‑‑Applicant Versus Mst. SHARIFAN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1979 P Cr
FATEH MUHAMMAD-Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, UNION COMMITTEE, WARD No. 14/15, SHALAMAR
Court: Lahore1984 P Cr
LAL BUX and 2 others — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1975 Lahore 951
FATEH MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, UNION COMMITTEE WARD NO. 14/15, LAHORE
Court: