Home Maxims & Terms Merits meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Merits

Merits legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1989 SCMR 1193 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S.8SeniorityMeritsNo statutory rules existed which prescribed the mode of `merit' as determining factor of seniorityClaim of seniority on basis of 'merit' not supported by any statute or rules

Held, rule of seniority by age, if the date of appointment was taken to be the same also, was not prohibited by law and if the date of joining service was to be taken into consideration as determining factor that too was not prohibited.

1985 SCMR 950 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 212(3)Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), S.8-PromotionMeritsPetitioner retired under M. L. R. 114On review re-instated in service without full consequential benefitsAllowed only subsistence allowance for intervening periodBenefit of seniority or pro forma promotion not assured

Service appeal dismissed by Tribunal-Supreme Court refused leave to appeal.-

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Merits", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14795

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Merits"

PLC(CS)N 2018
Writ Petition No.244-B of 2012, decided on 13th February, 2018.

2018 P L C (C

FARHAT SHAHEEN Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman and 2 others

Court: Peshawar High Court (Bannu Bench)
PLC(CS) 2019
Civil Petition No. 2350 of 2015, decided on 17th December, 2018.

2019 P L C (C

ABDULLAH NAWAZ CHEEMA Versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (FPSC), ISLAMABAD and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2019
Civil Petition No. 2350 of 2015, decided on 17th December, 2018.

2019 S C M R 622

ABDULLAH NAWAZ CHEEMA — Petitioner Versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION (FPSC), ISLAMABAD and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2014
First Appeals from Order Nos.68 and 69 of 2011, decided on 21st August, 2013.

2014 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD JAZIB ROOMI and another Versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and others

Court: Islamabad High Court
CLCN 2018
2018-January-17

2018 C L C Note 80

MAHAM JAHANGIR — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PLC(CS) 2012
Writ Petition No.11490 of 2012, decided on 31st May, 2012.

2012 P L C (C

NAVEED IQBAL Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2015
W.P. No.5914 of 2013, decided on 3rd April, 2015.

2015 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD IQBAL SHAHID Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Incharge Recruitment Complaints Redressal Cell/ Secretary (Revenue) and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court
MLD 2017
2016-November-8

2017 M L D 2005

TARIQUE AHMED SOLANGI — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Education, Government of Sindh, Karachi and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
MLD 2013
2013-March-9

2013 M L D 1191

Syed SIBTUL HASSAN GILLANI — Petitioner Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
MLD 2020
2020-March-3

2020 M L D 1484

ASNA FARRUKH — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore