Value

Public document could not be ignored merely because the same was not confronted and was not produced in Court within seven days

Intrinsic value of a public document was to be examined on its contents

Where it was not proved that copy of a public document was a false document nor it had been shown that Government functionaries had any special interest to manipulate the same as to deprive any person from his property, and the party concerned, in cross-examination, had admitted its contents, there was no need for getting such document confronted.

If there is a conflict between the entries in the Khasra Gardawari and the entries in the Record of Rights, the latter prevails.

Nature of evidence in respect of motive or medical expert was not a corroborative piece of evidence but only supporting evidence.

Circumstantial evidence-Value-Fact that accused was once seen in persons's house-Not sufficient by itself to prove "deep friendship" between two-Circumstantial evidence capable of alternative reasonable hypothesis- Conviction, mainly on such evidence-Not sustainable.