University
University legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Role of.
Petitioner impugned the re-appointment of the Vice Chancellor on the ground that under the University of Punjab Act, 1973, the Vice Chancellor could only be appointed for one term not exceeding four years and that the retirement age for the incumbent of said office was sixty years, whereas the incumbent Vice Chancellor had already attained age of superannuation and since his first term was over, his continued appointment was illegal
Contention of the University was that issues raised by the petitioner had become redundant in the light of the promulgation of the Public Sector Universities (Amendment) Act, 2012 whereby amendments were made to the University of the Punjab Act, 1973
Held, that the amendments in the University of the Punjab Act, 1973 envisaged that a person may be appointed as Vice Chancellor prior to attaining the age of sixty-five years and in the present case, the Vice Chancellor was reappointed at the age of sixty-one years
Section 14(8) of Public Sector Universities (Amendment) Act, 2012 provided that the incumbent Vice Chancellor was not allowed extension in his tenure but was eligible to compete for the Vice-Chancellor post after expiry of his term, and therefore, an incumbent Vice-Chancellor could be a candidate for re-appointment in a fresh selection process for the post
Vice-Chancellor, in the present case, was re-appointed as a result of a fresh selection process Public Sector Universities (Amendment) Act, 2012 contained a validation clause, whereby it could operate retrospectively, and it was a curative and remedial law which operated retrospectively to correct omissions and mistakes that were the subject matter of pending proceedings like the present case
Even otherwise, if the defects pointed out by the petitioner were presumed to exist, the same stood cured and remedied by the Public Sector Universities (Amendment) Act, 2012 with retrospective effect
Constitutional petition was therefore dismissed, in circumstances.
University not only enables future generations to equip themselves with degrees/practical tools to earn livelihood but also enriches them with learning, with wisdom and with visions for practical lives
To achieve its objects, University functions besides the Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor through its various institutions i.e., the Faculty, the Senate, the Syndicate and Board of Studies
Vice-Chancellor is a University's institutional head and enjoys a pivotal position
Being the executive and academic head of a University, it is for Vice-Chancellor to ensure that University's Statute, Regulations and Rules are faithfully observed
Vice-Chancellor presides over meetings of various bodies of University and affiliated colleges and in matters of urgent nature, it is the Vice-Chancellor who takes remedial steps; it is he who creates temporary posts when urgency requires; he sanctions expenditures provided for in approved budget, re-appropriates amounts not exceeding a certain amount; he convenes meetings of the Senate and the Syndicate
Vice-Chancellor is a bridge between executive and academic wings of University
Such multi-dimensional role of Vice Chancellor requires that person who occupies this office should be imbued with values and character traits of integrity, of academic excellence and administrative ability.
University - Examination - Allegations against student of using unfair means - University disqualifying candidate on reports submitted by Invigilator, Superintendent and Examiner without the candidate being ever confronted with such reports or given opportunity to refute those materials - Order passed by University, held, without lawful authority and of no consequence. Maxim: audi alteram partem applied.
University University-(Punjab)-Academic ordinance 19 read with Ordinance 18-"Suitable punishment"-Nature of punishment not indicated in Ordinance 19-Vice-Chancellor may impose penalties provided for in Ordinance 18.
University -Civil Court competent to grant relief against.
"University", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14889
Precedents & Case Laws citing "University"
P L D 2022 Peshawar 68
Professor Dr. IFTIKHAR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus GOVERNOR KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Principal Secretary and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2025 SCMR 322
ALL PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES BPS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION (APUBTA) through its President — Petitioner Versus The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Federal Education and Professional Training, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2017 Lahore 584
WAJID ALI — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2010 Y L R 595
MUHAMMAD MAJID HANIF — Petitioner Versus ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY BAHAWALPUR, through Vice-Chancellor and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2000 C L C 48
'ASHFAQ AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE through
Court: Lahore2010 Y L R 3144
MUNIR AKHTAR AWAN and others — Petitioners Versus KHALID MANSOOR and others — Respondents
Court: QuettaP L D 2003 Lahore 752
AHMAD ABDULLAH and 62 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: "143. Inconsistency between Federal and Provincial Laws.‑‑‑If any provision of an Act of a Provincial Assembly is repugnant to any provision of an Act of Majlis‑e‑Shoora (Parliament) which Majlis‑e‑Shoora (Parliament) is competent to enact, or to any provision of any existing law with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent Legislative List, then the Act of Majlis‑e‑Shoora (Parliament), whether passed before or after the Act of the Provincial Assembly, or, as the case may be, the existing law shall prevail and the Act of the Provincial Assembly, shall, to, the extent of the repugnancy, be void."P L D 2006 Karachi 82
MUHAMMAD RAHEEL SARWAR and 5 others — Petitioners Versus UNIVERSITY OF SINDH, JAMSHORO through REGISTRAR and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2017 P L C (C
FARMANULLAH KHAN Versus GOMAL UNIVERSITY D.I. KHAN and others
Court: Peshawar High Court (D.I. Khan Bench)2017 Y L R Note 414
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ASIA — Petitioner Versus HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION, PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore