Home Maxims & Terms University meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

University

University legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 MLD 2005 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
University

Role of.

2013 PLD 621 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 14 & 16Public Sector Universities (Amendment) Act (LX of 2012) S. 2, 14 & 16Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionUniversityAppointment of Vice-ChancellorValidating legislation, retrospective effect of

Petitioner impugned the re-appointment of the Vice Chancellor on the ground that under the University of Punjab Act, 1973, the Vice Chancellor could only be appointed for one term not exceeding four years and that the retirement age for the incumbent of said office was sixty years, whereas the incumbent Vice Chancellor had already attained age of superannuation and since his first term was over, his continued appointment was illegal

Contention of the University was that issues raised by the petitioner had become redundant in the light of the promulgation of the Public Sector Universities (Amendment) Act, 2012 whereby amendments were made to the University of the Punjab Act, 1973

Held, that the amendments in the University of the Punjab Act, 1973 envisaged that a person may be appointed as Vice Chancellor prior to attaining the age of sixty-five years and in the present case, the Vice Chancellor was reappointed at the age of sixty-one years

Section 14(8) of Public Sector Universities (Amendment) Act, 2012 provided that the incumbent Vice Chancellor was not allowed extension in his tenure but was eligible to compete for the Vice-Chancellor post after expiry of his term, and therefore, an incumbent Vice-Chancellor could be a candidate for re-appointment in a fresh selection process for the post

Vice-Chancellor, in the present case, was re-appointed as a result of a fresh selection process Public Sector Universities (Amendment) Act, 2012 contained a validation clause, whereby it could operate retrospectively, and it was a curative and remedial law which operated retrospectively to correct omissions and mistakes that were the subject matter of pending proceedings like the present case

Even otherwise, if the defects pointed out by the petitioner were presumed to exist, the same stood cured and remedied by the Public Sector Universities (Amendment) Act, 2012 with retrospective effect

Constitutional petition was therefore dismissed, in circumstances.

2012 SCMR 6 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Role of University and Vice-ChancellorUniversities are seats of learning and centres of excellence

University not only enables future generations to equip themselves with degrees/practical tools to earn livelihood but also enriches them with learning, with wisdom and with visions for practical lives

To achieve its objects, University functions besides the Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor through its various institutions i.e., the Faculty, the Senate, the Syndicate and Board of Studies

Vice-Chancellor is a University's institutional head and enjoys a pivotal position

Being the executive and academic head of a University, it is for Vice-Chancellor to ensure that University's Statute, Regulations and Rules are faithfully observed

Vice-Chancellor presides over meetings of various bodies of University and affiliated colleges and in matters of urgent nature, it is the Vice-Chancellor who takes remedial steps; it is he who creates temporary posts when urgency requires; he sanctions expenditures provided for in approved budget, re-appropriates amounts not exceeding a certain amount; he convenes meetings of the Senate and the Syndicate

Vice-Chancellor is a bridge between executive and academic wings of University

Such multi-dimensional role of Vice Chancellor requires that person who occupies this office should be imbued with values and character traits of integrity, of academic excellence and administrative ability.

1967 PLD 1204 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

University - Examination - Allegations against student of using unfair means - University disqualifying candidate on reports submitted by Invigilator, Superintendent and Examiner without the candidate being ever confronted with such reports or given opportunity to refute those materials - Order passed by University, held, without lawful authority and of no consequence. Maxim: audi alteram partem applied.

1961 PLD 130 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

University University-(Punjab)-Academic ordinance 19 read with Ordinance 18-"Suitable punishment"-Nature of punishment not indicated in Ordinance 19-Vice-Chancellor may impose penalties provided for in Ordinance 18.

1956 PLD 155 SINDH-CHIEF-COURT Judicial Precedent

University -Civil Court competent to grant relief against.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "University", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14889

Precedents & Case Laws citing "University"

PLD 2022
2021-September-22

P L D 2022 Peshawar 68

Professor Dr. IFTIKHAR AHMAD — Petitioner Versus GOVERNOR KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Principal Secretary and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2025
Constitution Petition No. 7 of 2024,decided on 24th October, 2024.

2025 SCMR 322

ALL PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES BPS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION (APUBTA) through its President — Petitioner Versus The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Federal Education and Professional Training, Islamabad and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2017
2017-April-3

P L D 2017 Lahore 584

WAJID ALI — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2010
Writ Petitions Nos.2615 of 2006/BWP, 1693, 1716, 1745 and 1948 of 2007/BWP, decided on 6th December 2007.

2010 Y L R 595

MUHAMMAD MAJID HANIF — Petitioner Versus ISLAMIA UNIVERSITY BAHAWALPUR, through Vice-Chancellor and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2000
Writ Petition No.260 of 1998, decided on 11th October, 1999. '~‑ .

2000 C L C 48

'ASHFAQ AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE through

Court: Lahore
YLR 2010
Constitutional Petitions Nos. 143 of 2003 and 334 of 2008, decided on 4th August, 2010.

2010 Y L R 3144

MUNIR AKHTAR AWAN and others — Petitioners Versus KHALID MANSOOR and others — Respondents

Court: Quetta
PLD 2003
Writ Petition No.7281 of 2003, decided on 16th July, 2003.

P L D 2003 Lahore 752

AHMAD ABDULLAH and 62 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: "143. Inconsistency between Federal and Provincial Laws.‑‑‑If any provision of an Act of a Provincial Assembly is repugnant to any provision of an Act of Majlis‑e‑Shoora (Parliament) which Majlis‑e‑Shoora (Parliament) is competent to enact, or to any provision of any existing law with respect to any of the matters enumerated in the Concurrent Legislative List, then the Act of Majlis‑e‑Shoora (Parliament), whether passed before or after the Act of the Provincial Assembly, or, as the case may be, the existing law shall prevail and the Act of the Provincial Assembly, shall, to, the extent of the repugnancy, be void."
PLD 2006
2003-December-22

P L D 2006 Karachi 82

MUHAMMAD RAHEEL SARWAR and 5 others — Petitioners Versus UNIVERSITY OF SINDH, JAMSHORO through REGISTRAR and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS)N 2017
W.P. No.320-D of 2014, decided on 18th April, 2017.

2017 P L C (C

FARMANULLAH KHAN Versus GOMAL UNIVERSITY D.I. KHAN and others

Court: Peshawar High Court (D.I. Khan Bench)
YLRN 2017
Writ Petition No.5142 of 2016, decided on 12th April, 2017.

2017 Y L R Note 414

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ASIA — Petitioner Versus HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION, PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore