Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Cause meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Cause

Cause legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1990 CLC 497 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases Word "cause" would mean "something that proceeds and brings about an effect or result".

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Cause", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1490

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Cause"

PCRLJ 1989
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 810/B of 1988/BWP, decided on 26th June, 1988.

1989 P Cr

GHULAM FAREED Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1978
Appeal No. 16 of 1976, decided on 15th November 1977.

1978 P L C [C

ABDUL WAHID BALUCH Versus PROVINCE OF BALUCHISTAN

Court: 1978 P L C C.S.T. 45
PCRLJ 1980
Criminal Appeal No: 42 of 1978, decided on 9th July, 1979.

1980 P Cr

AMEER ALI alias SITY‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 1999
Income-tax Reference No. 26 of 1987, decided on 5th January, .1998

1999 P T D 3397

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus INDIAN SMELTING AND REFINING CO. LTD

Court: 230 I T R 194
PTD 2018
M.A.(A.G.) S.T.A. No.16/IB of 2017 and S.T.A. No.7/IB of 2009, decided on 12th September, 2017.

2018 P T D (Trib

Messrs INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS Versus The COLLECTOR (APPEALS), SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, ISLAMABAD

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
MLD 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1006/B of 1985, decided on 19th October, 1985.

1986 M L D 1999

FAIZ and 4 others Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2003
Customs Appeal No.316/CE of 2001, decided on 10th February, 200.

2003 P T D 1257

Messrs ZAMINDARA PAPER & BOARDS MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, FAISALABAD Versus COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
SCMR 2023
Civil Petitions Nos. 1842-L and 1843-L of 2022, decided on 11th September, 2022.

2023 S C M R 1856

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE — Petitioner Versus Messrs RYK MILLS — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1969
Criminal Appeal No. 229 of 1966 and Acquittal Appeal No. 5 of 1967, decided on 14th December 1967.

P L D 1969 Karachi 162

ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE‑GENERAL, KARACHI‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 2020
merits instead of knocking out the parties on the basis of technicalities but whenever a suit was dismissed in default then plaintiff should mention a cause for such lapse---Provisions of O.IX, R.9, C.P.C. could not be dispensed with merely on the ground that suit was to be decided on merits---Court had to keep the scale of justice equal and provisions of O. IX, R.9, C.P.C. could not be used for the advantage of one party and disadvantage of the other---Parties should be vigilant while prosecuting their cause---Trial Court had rightly applied the law to the subject and application for restoration of suit was dismissed through a well-reasoned order---Impugned order passed by the Appellate Court was set aside and that of Trial Court was restored---Application for restoration of suit was dismissed, in circumstances---Revision was allowed accordingly

2020 C L C 1652

EJAZ AHMAD through Attorney — Petitioner Versus RAI MUHAMMAD RIAZ (DECEASED) through Legal Heirs and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library