Rehabilitation Guzara Scheme
Rehabilitation Guzara Scheme legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Art. 185(3)-Rehabilitation Guzara Scheme-Petitioner relying on a Parchi Taqseem showing interest in disputed land but same not produced before High Court in spite of opportunity given to them, petitioners also failing to deposit costs as directed by High Court Leave to appeal declined.
"Rehabilitation Guzara Scheme", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14928
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Rehabilitation Guzara Scheme"
1982 S C M R 425
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AND 2 ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High Court1983 C L C 1492
ABDUL HAMID‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LANDS),
Court: Lahore1984 S C M R 156
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus SETTLEMENT ORGANIZATION AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High Court1999 M L D 869
Mst. BASHIRAN BIBI — Petitioner Versus Mst. FATIMA JAN and 11 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1983 C L C 216
CHIRAGH DIN‑Petitioner Versus BORDER AREA COMA41TTEE AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1991 C L C 546
Mst. BARKAT BIBI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus Mst. SAKINA BIBI and 7 others ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2008 Lahore 364
KHURSHID AHMAD — Petitioner Versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-IV), BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1986 M L D 420
YAQUB KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (C) and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1988 M L D 1015
MUHAMMAD SADIO and another‑‑Petitioners Versus SARDAR BIBI and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1991 Supreme Court 391
GHULAM MUHAMMAD and another ‑‑‑ Appellants Versus AHMAD KHAN and another ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑ Ss. 14 (1‑A) as introduced by Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) (Amendment) Ordinance (VI of 1974), Ss.10, 11 & 2(1)‑‑‑ Where any person had furnished information about the bogus and fraudulent 'allotment' of land, only in such a case land could be resumed‑‑‑Where the land had not been 'allotted' under the Act or any Rehabilitation Scheme the question of resumption of the land granted to persons ex gratia would not arise.