Home Maxims & Terms Transhipment meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Transhipment

Transhipment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1988 SCMR 1259 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Transhipment"

Meaning of.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Transhipment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/14931

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Transhipment"

PLD 1960
Suit No. 1087 of 1952, decided on 19th February 1960.

P L D 1960 (W

MICHAL ASSELY and others‑Plaintiffs Versus MESSRS ABDUL SATTAR & BROS.‑Defendants

Court:
PTD 2003
Writ Petitions Nos.3430, 3431 and 2332 of 2002, decided on 5th May, 2003.

2003 P T D 2030

Messrs EHSAN-UD-DIN & COMPANY, LAHORE Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION/CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 1992
Constitutional Petition No.D‑719 of 1991, heard on 22nd October, 1991.

1992 C L C 57

M. HAMEEDULLAH KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR CUSTOMS INTELLIGENCE and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1980
Writ Petition No. 2409 of 1979, decided on 6th October 1979.

P L D 1980 Lahore 469

MESSRS LINK ENGINEERING COMPANY LTD.-Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CENTRAL BOARD OF

Court: S. 30-Word "transhipment"-Means to transfer for further transportation from one ship or conveyance to another.-Words and phrases,
SCMR 1988
Civil Appeals No s. K‑98 to 101‑K of 1972, decided on 14th January, 1988.

1988 S C M R 1259

KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs HARJINA SALT CHEMICALS (PAK .) LTD. and 3 others‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1968
First Appeal No. 191 of 1961, decided on 24th May 1967.

P L D 1968 Karachi 320

HAJI MOOSA HAN OOMER‑Appellant Versus AHMED ABDUL GANI AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: (f) Carriage of goods by sea‑C. I. F. Contract ‑ Buyer alleging fraud that bill of lading was forged and that gods were never shipped‑Onus on buyer to prove fraud‑Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 102‑Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 17‑Home Insurance Co. Ltd., New York v. Ramnrth & Co. A I .R 1955 Mad. 602 ref..
SCMR 2001
Civil Appeals Nos. 1361 to 1381 and Criminal Appeals Nos.348, 349. and 158 to 170 of 2000, decided on 31st January, 2001.

2001 S C M R 1083

THE STATE through Collector of Customs — Appellant Versus NASIM AMIN BUTT and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1987
Civil Miscellaneous Application in Admiralty Suit No.495 of 1986, decided on 10th September, 1976.

1987 C L C 1808(2)

Messrs F.C.L. Ltd.‑‑Plaintiff Versus m.v. BROOKLYN and others‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PTD 2001
N/A

2001 P T D 2079

Messrs TAHSEEN (PVT.) LTD. Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, DRY PORT,

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1998
N/A

1998 P T D 2561

Messrs TAHSEEN (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE Versus ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS DRY PORT,

Court: Lahore High Court