Footprints
Footprints legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Carries no weight by itself.
Footprints -Identification of-Recovery of blood-stained clothes-Not in themselves sufficient for conviction for murder.
"Footprints", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15023
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Footprints"
P L D 1988 Karachi 637
GUL00 alias GUL MUHAMMAD‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑ Respondent
Court: High Court2002 P Cr
AMIR BAKHSH‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Federal Shariat CourtP L D 1982 Lahore 593
MAQBOOL AHMAD‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: -- S. 45‑Expert evidence‑Evidentiary value of‑"Track evidence", held, always considered as weak evidence and not safe to accept a tracker's opinion as last word in judicial proceedings.‑Expert evidence.P L -D 1981 Karachi 581
QADIR BAKHSH‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: S. 164‑Confessional statement, voluntariness of‑Neither specific questions pat to accused at time of recording his confession nor administered second warning after allowing time for reflection Confession recorded with unexplained delay of 24 hours‑Possibility of undue pressure having been brought on accused for making judicial confession, not ruled out‑‑Confession, held, not made voluntarily, in circumstances.‑Confession.1991 P Cr
ABDUL RAZZAQ alias KALA — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1975 P Cr
GHULAM MUSTAFA AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2024 Y L R 2521
Muhammad Nadeem — Appellant Versus The State and another — Respondent
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)1991 P Cr
ALLAH DITTA and 2 others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore2000 Y L R 1303
PUNHOO alias HALIM‑‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi2007 M L D 23
AYOOB — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi