Home Maxims & Terms New Point meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

New Point

New Point legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1985 SCMR 2008 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Practice and procedureNew pointQuestion of law not urged before High Court

Supreme Court declined to consider in appeal a question of law on which leave was not granted and which was not urged before High Court and Court did not have benefit of view of High Court on that point.

1983 SCMR 254 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 185 (3)-Leave to appeal-New point-Contention available to petitioner even earlier when writ petitions filed but not urged therein, held, could not be raised by petitioner during proceedings for leave to appeal.

1983 SCMR 190 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 212 (3) read with Art. 185 (3)-Leave to appeal-New point-Question of law of public importance -Contentions as to respondent being not a civil servant and action taken against him being not mala fide not raised either by filing a reply to memo. of appeal filed by respondent before Service Tribunal or by addressing arguments before such tribunal-Held : Not possible in circumstances, to meaningfully review finding of Tribunal-Appeal besides, also not raising any question of law of public importance, leave to appeal not justified.

1983 SCMR 133 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 185(3)-Leave to appeal-New point-Points neither taken before lower appellate Court nor mentioned in petition for leave to appeal-Held, cannot be permitted to be urged' before Supreme Court.

1982 SCMR 858 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Arts. 185 (3)-Leave to appeal-New point-Plea raised before Supreme Court never raised before any of departmental forums Point also of factual nature requiring decision whether a particular person survived his propositus-High Court also not permitting to raise such question in view of its being not supported by any authentic evidence-Petition pending for about 5 years and no evidence available to support plea-No question of remand, held, arose in circumstances and petition for leave to appeal liable to be dismissed.

1981 SCMR 653 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 8 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3)-New point-Litigation between parties going on for more than 20 years and at no stage contention as to Jirga or Courts constituted under Regulation being not competent to deal with matter raised-Point as to suit in question having not been competently drawn into ambit of F. C. R. under S. 8 thereof not raised in any Court and even not raised in petition for leave to appeal-Point not allowed to be raised at late stage of leave to appeal.

1981 SCMR 479 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 185(3)-Leave to appeal-New point

Plea as to petitioner's prosecution having been conducted without obtaining sanction of appropriate Government and conviction as such being bad not raised in Courts below-Leave to examine such question at leave to appeal stage refused.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "New Point", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15029

Precedents & Case Laws citing "New Point"

CLC 1999
Civil Appeal No.47 of 1998, decided on 25th November,. 1998.

1999 C L C 1182

Islamabad and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus Ch. MUHAMMAD SADIQ and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
YLR 2000
Civil Review Petition No. 4 of 2000, decided on 28th April, 2000.

2000 Y L R 2092

KASHMIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
MLD 1985
First Rent Appeal No. 311 of 1.984, decided on 7th May, 19B5.

1985 M L D 121

Mrs. HAMIDA MALIK — Appellant Versus Mrs. RAFFAT JEHAN BEGUM — Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1986
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 825 of 1984, decided on 26th January, 1986.

1986 S C M R 955

Mian GHULAM RASOOL — Petitioner Versus BASHIR AHMAD and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1961
Revision Side No. 173 of 1959‑60, decided on 21st January 1961, District Attock.

P L D 1961 W

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN‑Petitioner Versus AFSAR KHAN‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1986
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 358-K of 1985, decided on 25th August, 1986.

1986 S C M R 1859

MANZOOR AHMAD KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus MOIN NAWAZ JANG and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1986
Civil Petition No. 124-R of 1986, decided on 25th June, 1986.

1986 S C M R 1621

NASIR AHMAD SHAIKH — Petitioner Versus Mrs. NAHID A. SHAIKH and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1968
Fourth Civil Review Petition No. 87 of 1967, decided on 22nd December 1967.

1968 SCMR 104

Mst. NAWAB BIBI AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus Mst. HAMIDA BEGUM AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1983
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1027 of 1976, decided on 15th March, 1983.

1983 S C M R 1090

ABDUL RAB AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, A. D. C. (G),

Court: High Court
PLD 1969
Regular Further Appeal No. 21 of 1962, decided on 13th May 1969.

P L D 1969 Peshawar 241

GHULAM MUSTAFA‑Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus Haji MIAN MUHAXIMAD AND ANOTHER‑Defendants

Court: